
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

M1 Pro
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +42.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while M1 Pro needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while M1 Pro mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β346.4% higher power demand at 125W vs 28W.
M1 Pro
2021Why buy it
- β Draws 28W instead of 125W, a 97W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (17,218 vs 45,784).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-13700K
2022M1 Pro
2021Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +42.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while M1 Pro needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- β Draws 28W instead of 125W, a 97W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while M1 Pro mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β346.4% higher power demand at 125W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (17,218 vs 45,784).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than M1 Pro?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | M1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | M1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 77 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | M1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 430 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 359 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 271 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 217 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | M1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 430 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 430 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 430 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 429 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 315 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and M1 Pro

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.
M1 Pro
M1 Pro
The M1 Pro is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 18 October 2021 (4 years ago). It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.064 GHz, with boost up to 3.22 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 MBΒ +Β 24 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 17,218 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the M1 Pro offers 10 cores / 10 threads β the Core i7-13700K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 3.22 GHz on the M1 Pro β a 50.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.064 GHz). The Core i7-13700K is built on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the M1 Pro's 17,218 β a 90.7% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 24 MB on the M1 Pro.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | M1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+60% | 10 / 10 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+68% | 3.22 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+65% | 2.064 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+25% | 24 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 28 MB+1300% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | β |
| PassMark | 45,784+166% | 17,218 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M1 Pro uses none (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | M1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | Yes | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core i7-13700K) / not specified (M1 Pro). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the M1 Pro requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | M1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | β |
| Unlocked | Yes | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | true | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













