PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +98.4% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Delivers 142.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 46.1 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Processor U300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌
111.9% HIGHER MSRP
$409 MSRPvs$193 MSRP
❌733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.

Processor U300

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $216 less on MSRP ($193 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,897 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 46.1 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Processor U300

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +98.4% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Delivers 142.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 46.1 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Processor U300 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Costs $216 less on MSRP ($193 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌
111.9% HIGHER MSRP
$409 MSRPvs$193 MSRP
❌733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,897 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 46.1 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Processor U300?

Yes. Core i7-13700K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 98.4% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data and 414.6% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 98.4% more average FPS across 47 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 414.6% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is 111.9% more expensive on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $193 MSRP, and it gives you a 98.4% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 142.8% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 46.1 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Processor U300 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Processor U300 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Processor U300
1080p
low	284 FPS	183 FPS
medium	268 FPS	150 FPS
high	223 FPS	122 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	150 FPS
medium	200 FPS	118 FPS
high	159 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	84 FPS
medium	134 FPS	72 FPS
high	103 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	45 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Processor U300

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Processor U300
1080p
low	689 FPS	166 FPS
medium	580 FPS	137 FPS
high	484 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	110 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	146 FPS
medium	525 FPS	123 FPS
high	441 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	99 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	113 FPS
medium	314 FPS	98 FPS
high	295 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	72 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Processor U300

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Processor U300
1080p
low	648 FPS	222 FPS
medium	530 FPS	222 FPS
high	467 FPS	222 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	222 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	222 FPS
medium	491 FPS	222 FPS
high	427 FPS	222 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	222 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	222 FPS
medium	374 FPS	222 FPS
high	339 FPS	206 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	163 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Processor U300

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Processor U300
1080p
low	970 FPS	222 FPS
medium	883 FPS	222 FPS
high	766 FPS	222 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	222 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	222 FPS
medium	740 FPS	222 FPS
high	642 FPS	222 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	222 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	222 FPS
medium	515 FPS	222 FPS
high	463 FPS	222 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	222 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Processor U300

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Processor U300

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Processor U300

The Processor U300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 5 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,897 points. Launch price was $193.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Processor U300 offers 5 cores / 6 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 11 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4.4 GHz on the Processor U300 — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Processor U300 uses Raptor Lake-U (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Processor U300's 8,897 — a 134.9% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 8 MB (total) on the Processor U300.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Processor U300
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+220%	5 / 6
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+23%	4.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+183%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)+275%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+60%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Raptor Lake-U (2023)
PassMark	45,784+415%	8,897
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Processor U300 uses FCBGA1744 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Processor U300
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA1744
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-13700K) / not specified (Processor U300). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Processor U300 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Processor U300
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	true	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Processor U300 debuted at $193. On MSRP ($409 vs $193), the Processor U300 is $216 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 46.1 pts/$ for the Processor U300 — making the Core i7-13700K the 83.3% better value option.