
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 4600GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +50.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Delivers 40.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 79.4 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌104.5% HIGHER MSRP$409 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Ryzen 5 4600GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $209 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (7,800 vs 31,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 79.4 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($200 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Core i7-13700K
2022Ryzen 5 4600GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +50.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Delivers 40.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 79.4 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $209 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌104.5% HIGHER MSRP$409 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (7,800 vs 31,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 79.4 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($200 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Ryzen 5 4600GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 4600GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 4600GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 156 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 4600GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 397 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 397 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 362 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 227 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 4600GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 397 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 397 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 378 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 316 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen 5 4600GE

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.


Ryzen 5 4600GE
Ryzen 5 4600GE
The Ryzen 5 4600GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,889 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 5 4600GE offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 4600GE — a 25% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 4600GE uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen 5 4600GE's 15,889 — a 96.9% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 7,800 (119.6% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 4600GE.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 4600GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+167% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+29% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+3% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+275% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 45,784+188% | 15,889 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000+297% | 7,800 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 4600GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 4600GE — the Core i7-13700K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 4600GE) — the Ryzen 5 4600GE offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and AM4 (Ryzen 5 4600GE).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 4600GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+200% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 5 4600GE). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and Radeon Vega 7 (Ryzen 5 4600GE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 4600GE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon Vega 7 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 4600GE debuted at $200. On MSRP ($409 vs $200), the Ryzen 5 4600GE is $209 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 79.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 4600GE — making the Core i7-13700K the 34% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 5 4600GE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409 | $200-51% |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.9+41% | 79.4 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












