PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Delivers 38.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 81.0 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 8400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌
35% HIGHER MSRP
$409 MSRPvs$303 MSRP
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

Ryzen 5 8400F

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $106 less on MSRP ($303 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (24,554 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.0 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Ryzen 5 8400F

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Delivers 38.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 81.0 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 5 8400F needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Costs $106 less on MSRP ($303 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌
35% HIGHER MSRP
$409 MSRPvs$303 MSRP
❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (24,554 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 81.0 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Ryzen 5 8400F?

Yes. Core i7-13700K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 14.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 86.5% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 14.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 86.5% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is 35.0% more expensive on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $303 MSRP, and it gives you a 14.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 38.1% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 81.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM5 + DDR5 setup, Ryzen 5 8400F can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 8400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 8400F Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen 5 8400F
1080p
low	284 FPS	178 FPS
medium	268 FPS	151 FPS
high	223 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	102 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	151 FPS
medium	200 FPS	124 FPS
high	159 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	84 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	81 FPS
medium	134 FPS	72 FPS
high	103 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	45 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen 5 8400F

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen 5 8400F
1080p
low	689 FPS	374 FPS
medium	580 FPS	316 FPS
high	484 FPS	278 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	238 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	326 FPS
medium	525 FPS	282 FPS
high	441 FPS	255 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	214 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	243 FPS
medium	314 FPS	215 FPS
high	295 FPS	198 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	165 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen 5 8400F

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen 5 8400F
1080p
low	648 FPS	614 FPS
medium	530 FPS	614 FPS
high	467 FPS	614 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	614 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	614 FPS
medium	491 FPS	603 FPS
high	427 FPS	522 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	446 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	492 FPS
medium	374 FPS	431 FPS
high	339 FPS	369 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	303 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen 5 8400F

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen 5 8400F
1080p
low	970 FPS	614 FPS
medium	883 FPS	614 FPS
high	766 FPS	614 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	614 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	614 FPS
medium	740 FPS	614 FPS
high	642 FPS	614 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	601 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	610 FPS
medium	515 FPS	548 FPS
high	463 FPS	490 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	426 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen 5 8400F

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen 5 8400F

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Ryzen 5 8400F

The Ryzen 5 8400F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,554 points. Launch price was $170.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 5 8400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 8400F — a 13.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 8400F uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen 5 8400F's 24,554 — a 60.4% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 8400F.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen 5 8400F
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+167%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+15%	4.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	4.2 GHz+24%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)+88%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Phoenix (2023−2024)
PassMark	45,784+86%	24,554
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 8400F uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen 5 8400F
Socket	LGA1700	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-13700K) / not specified (Ryzen 5 8400F). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 5 8400F requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen 5 8400F
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	true	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 8400F debuted at $303. On MSRP ($409 vs $303), the Ryzen 5 8400F is $106 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 81.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 8400F — making the Core i7-13700K the 32% better value option.