
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 8840HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 7 8840HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌346.4% higher power demand at 125W vs 28W.
Ryzen 7 8840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 125W, a 97W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,156 vs 45,784).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-13700K
2022Ryzen 7 8840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 7 8840HS needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 125W, a 97W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌346.4% higher power demand at 125W vs 28W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,156 vs 45,784).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Ryzen 7 8840HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 410 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 202 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 629 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 629 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 629 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 594 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 629 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 622 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 451 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 521 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 345 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 629 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 629 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 629 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 629 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 629 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 629 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 629 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 548 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 384 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen 7 8840HS

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.


Ryzen 7 8840HS
Ryzen 7 8840HS
The Ryzen 7 8840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,156 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8840HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8840HS — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8840HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen 7 8840HS's 25,156 — a 58.2% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8840HS.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+6% | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+3% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+88% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 45,784+82% | 25,156 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 8840HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core i7-13700K) / not specified (Ryzen 7 8840HS). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 7 8840HS requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












