
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅+94.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,930 vs 31,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
Core i7-13700K
2022Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅+94.6% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (15,930 vs 31,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS better than Core i7-13700K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 427 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 374 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 273 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 209 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 727 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 636 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 547 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 463 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 343 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 727 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 727 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 727 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 716 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 631 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 434 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.


Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,088 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS's 29,088 — a 44.6% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 15,930 (64.2% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 2,332, a 19.9% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 11,037 (52.9% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+6% | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+88% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 45,784+57% | 29,088 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000+95% | 15,930 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846+22% | 2,332 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980+72% | 11,037 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 256 GB+33% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS targets Enterprise Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS rivals Core i7-13700H.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | — | Enterprise Performance Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












