
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 5900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 81.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 61.8 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 9 5900 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Ryzen 9 5900
2021Why buy it
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (33,912 vs 45,784).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.8 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-13700K
2022Ryzen 9 5900
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 81.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 61.8 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 9 5900 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (33,912 vs 45,784).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.8 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Ryzen 9 5900?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 437 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 608 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 440 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 358 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 253 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 805 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 543 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 690 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 490 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 359 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 848 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 848 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 836 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 744 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 848 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 760 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 665 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 570 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 626 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 494 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen 9 5900

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.


Ryzen 9 5900
Ryzen 9 5900
The Ryzen 9 5900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 33,912 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900 — a 13.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen 9 5900's 33,912 — a 29.8% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+15% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+13% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 64 MB+113% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 45,784+35% | 33,912 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900 — the Core i7-13700K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900) — the Ryzen 9 5900 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 9 5900 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900 targets OEM Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | OEM Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 5900 debuted at $549. On MSRP ($409 vs $549), the Core i7-13700K is $140 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 61.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900 — making the Core i7-13700K the 57.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-26% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.9+81% | 61.8 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












