
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 7950X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $290 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 170W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (31,000 vs 37,452).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 7950X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 89.2 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌36% higher power demand at 170W vs 125W.
Core i7-13700K
2022Ryzen 9 7950X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $290 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 89.2 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 170W, a 45W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7950X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (31,000 vs 37,452).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 89.2 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($699 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌36% higher power demand at 170W vs 125W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7950X better than Core i7-13700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 272 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 109 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 807 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 660 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 518 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 448 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 668 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 456 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 253 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 732 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 590 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 398 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 614 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 500 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 338 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 435 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 261 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 1002 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 882 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 764 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 685 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 814 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 700 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 604 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 517 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 593 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 519 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 387 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen 9 7950X

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.


Ryzen 9 7950X
Ryzen 9 7950X
The Ryzen 9 7950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-09-27. It is based on the Raphael (Zen 4) (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,343 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the Ryzen 9 7950X's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X uses Raphael (Zen 4) (2022) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen 9 7950X's 62,343 — a 30.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 37,452 (18.9% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 2,976, a 4.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 19,297 (1.7% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz | 5.7 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+113% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Raphael (Zen 4) (2022) |
| PassMark | 45,784 | 62,343+36% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000 | 37,452+21% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846 | 2,976+5% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980 | 19,297+2% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 7950X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 7950X) — the Ryzen 9 7950X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and X670E,X670,B650E,B650 (Ryzen 9 7950X).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 7950X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and Radeon Graphics (2 Cores) (Ryzen 9 7950X) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Ryzen 9 7950X rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon Graphics (2 Cores) |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | true |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X debuted at $699. On MSRP ($409 vs $699), the Core i7-13700K is $290 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 89.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X — making the Core i7-13700K the 22.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-41% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.9+25% | 89.2 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












