
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
2022Why buy it
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (23,200 vs 31,000).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-13700K
2022Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (23,200 vs 31,000).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Ryzen 9 PRO 5945?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 544 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 381 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 385 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 221 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 845 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 670 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 586 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 494 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 676 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 535 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 387 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 480 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 398 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 293 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 864 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 864 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 836 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 743 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 864 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 757 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 661 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 566 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 626 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 490 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 423 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen 9 PRO 5945

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.


Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
The Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 34,549 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 — a 13.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945's 34,549 — a 28% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 23,200 (28.8% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 2,175, a 26.7% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 12,500 (41.2% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+15% | 4.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+13% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 64 MB+113% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 45,784+33% | 34,549 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000+34% | 23,200 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846+31% | 2,175 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980+52% | 12,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 — the Core i7-13700K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and X570,B550,A520,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 PRO 5945).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 9 PRO 5945). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 targets High-end Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 rivals Core i9-12900.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V (SVM) |
| Target Use | — | High-end Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












