PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅+87.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,500 vs 31,000).

Core i7-13700K

2022

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

2025

Why buy it

✅+87.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 55W instead of 125W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌127.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 55W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,500 vs 31,000).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 better than Core i7-13700K?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is ahead with a 14.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K pulls ahead with 87.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 87.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i7-13700K makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $409 MSRP, and it gives you a 14.4% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Core i7-13700K is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 87.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i7-13700K is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
1080p
low	284 FPS	277 FPS
medium	268 FPS	243 FPS
high	223 FPS	209 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	179 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	233 FPS
medium	200 FPS	185 FPS
high	159 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	162 FPS
medium	134 FPS	129 FPS
high	103 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	86 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
1080p
low	689 FPS	684 FPS
medium	580 FPS	565 FPS
high	484 FPS	460 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	417 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	591 FPS
medium	525 FPS	514 FPS
high	441 FPS	422 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	360 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	352 FPS
medium	314 FPS	311 FPS
high	295 FPS	286 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	251 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
1080p
low	648 FPS	788 FPS
medium	530 FPS	788 FPS
high	467 FPS	706 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	594 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	788 FPS
medium	491 FPS	644 FPS
high	427 FPS	559 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	472 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	562 FPS
medium	374 FPS	459 FPS
high	339 FPS	408 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	338 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
1080p
low	970 FPS	788 FPS
medium	883 FPS	788 FPS
high	766 FPS	788 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	781 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	788 FPS
medium	740 FPS	768 FPS
high	642 FPS	673 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	590 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	609 FPS
medium	515 FPS	541 FPS
high	463 FPS	486 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	426 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,508 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385's 31,508 — a 36.9% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 16,500 (61.1% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 2,886, a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 14,136 (29.3% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+8%	5 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	3.6 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+7%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark	45,784+45%	31,508
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000+88%	16,500
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846	2,886+1%
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980+34%	14,136

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 8 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and Strix Halo platform (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385).

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Socket	LGA1700	FP11
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	LPDDR5x-8000
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 targets Enterprise AI Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 rivals M3 Max.