PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $890 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 369.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 23.8 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 250W, a 125W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

2018

Why buy it

✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (29,045 vs 31,000).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.8 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 250W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $890 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 369.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 23.8 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $1,299 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 250W, a 125W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (29,045 vs 31,000).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.8 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($1,299 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌100% higher power demand at 250W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 4.9% more average FPS across 48 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 6.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is $890 cheaper on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $1,299 MSRP, and it gives you a 4.9% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 369.8% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 23.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2018), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of TR4, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 24/48. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
1080p
low	284 FPS	198 FPS
medium	268 FPS	177 FPS
high	223 FPS	143 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	115 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	160 FPS
medium	200 FPS	134 FPS
high	159 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	85 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	73 FPS
medium	134 FPS	64 FPS
high	103 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	41 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
1080p
low	689 FPS	536 FPS
medium	580 FPS	483 FPS
high	484 FPS	404 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	354 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	473 FPS
medium	525 FPS	424 FPS
high	441 FPS	360 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	299 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	295 FPS
medium	314 FPS	265 FPS
high	295 FPS	242 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	213 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
1080p
low	648 FPS	768 FPS
medium	530 FPS	640 FPS
high	467 FPS	577 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	504 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	640 FPS
medium	491 FPS	533 FPS
high	427 FPS	465 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	408 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	469 FPS
medium	374 FPS	377 FPS
high	339 FPS	336 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	280 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
1080p
low	970 FPS	774 FPS
medium	883 FPS	774 FPS
high	766 FPS	704 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	616 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	730 FPS
medium	740 FPS	644 FPS
high	642 FPS	549 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	474 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	523 FPS
medium	515 FPS	473 FPS
high	463 FPS	419 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	362 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX

The Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,954 points. Launch price was $1,299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX — a 25% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX's 30,954 — a 38.7% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 29,045 (6.5% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 1,240, a 78.6% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 7,241 (89.5% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+29%	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+13%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	64 MB+113%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-42%	12 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Zen+ (2018−2019)
PassMark	45,784+48%	30,954
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000+7%	29,045
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846+130%	1,240
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980+162%	7,241

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX — the Core i7-13700K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX).

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Socket	LGA1700	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+25%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	2048 GB+967%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX targets Extreme Multi-threaded Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX rivals Core i9-7940X.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Extreme Multi-threaded Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX debuted at $1299. On MSRP ($409 vs $1299), the Core i7-13700K is $890 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 23.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX — making the Core i7-13700K the 129.8% better value option.