
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen Z2 Go
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +95.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen Z2 Go mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌6150% higher power demand at 125W vs 2W.
Ryzen Z2 Go
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 125W, a 123W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (5,802 vs 31,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 30 MB).
Core i7-13700K
2022Ryzen Z2 Go
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +95.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+275% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 125W, a 123W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Ryzen Z2 Go mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌6150% higher power demand at 125W vs 2W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (5,802 vs 31,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 30 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Ryzen Z2 Go?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 249 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 119 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 220 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 305 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Ryzen Z2 Go

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.


Ryzen Z2 Go
Ryzen Z2 Go
The Ryzen Z2 Go is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Rembrandt R (2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB + 8 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 12,188 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen Z2 Go offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Z2 Go — a 22.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen Z2 Go uses Rembrandt R (2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Ryzen Z2 Go's 12,188 — a 115.9% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 5,802 (136.9% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 1,842, a 42.8% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 6,073 (103% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 8 MB on the Ryzen Z2 Go.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+300% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+26% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+13% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+275% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Rembrandt R (2025) |
| PassMark | 45,784+276% | 12,188 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000+434% | 5,802 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846+55% | 1,842 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980+213% | 6,073 |
Memory & Platform
Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 16 (Ryzen Z2 Go) — the Core i7-13700K offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and Rembrandt-R (Ryzen Z2 Go).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | — |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | LPDDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+200% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs SVM (Ryzen Z2 Go). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) and Radeon 680M (Ryzen Z2 Go) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Z2 Go targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Ryzen Z2 Go rivals Core Ultra 5 135U.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | SVM |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












