PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $786 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
✅Delivers 174.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 40.8 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 190W, a 65W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon 6517P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (45,784 vs 48,810).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 72 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6517P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.

Xeon 6517P

2025

Why buy it

✅+6.6% higher PassMark.
✅+140% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅340% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 40.8 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($1,195 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌52% higher power demand at 190W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Xeon 6517P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $786 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
✅Delivers 174.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 40.8 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 190W, a 65W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon 6517P needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+6.6% higher PassMark.
✅+140% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅340% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (45,784 vs 48,810).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 72 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6517P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 40.8 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($1,195 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌52% higher power demand at 190W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Xeon 6517P?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon 6517P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6517P is the better fit. You are getting 6.6% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 140% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is $786 cheaper on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $1,195 MSRP, and it gives you a 7.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon 6517P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 6.6% better PassMark. It is also 174.1% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 40.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6517P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022), 140% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 30 MB), more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 16/24, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Xeon 6517P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon 6517P
1080p
low	284 FPS	192 FPS
medium	268 FPS	153 FPS
high	223 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	97 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	157 FPS
medium	200 FPS	122 FPS
high	159 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	72 FPS
medium	134 FPS	60 FPS
high	103 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	38 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon 6517P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon 6517P
1080p
low	689 FPS	559 FPS
medium	580 FPS	488 FPS
high	484 FPS	396 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	353 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	483 FPS
medium	525 FPS	426 FPS
high	441 FPS	357 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	299 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	302 FPS
medium	314 FPS	270 FPS
high	295 FPS	244 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	220 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon 6517P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon 6517P
1080p
low	648 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	530 FPS	986 FPS
high	467 FPS	910 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	824 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	859 FPS
medium	491 FPS	755 FPS
high	427 FPS	697 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	626 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	541 FPS
medium	374 FPS	442 FPS
high	339 FPS	389 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	319 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon 6517P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon 6517P
1080p
low	970 FPS	1022 FPS
medium	883 FPS	916 FPS
high	766 FPS	782 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	672 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	788 FPS
medium	740 FPS	689 FPS
high	642 FPS	586 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	504 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	563 FPS
medium	515 FPS	501 FPS
high	463 FPS	441 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	377 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon 6517P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Xeon 6517P

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon 6517P

The Xeon 6517P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 190 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 48,810 points. Launch price was $1,195.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the Xeon 6517P's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon 6517P — a 25% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon 6517P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Xeon 6517P's 48,810 — a 6.4% lead for the Xeon 6517P. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6517P.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon 6517P
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	16 / 32
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+29%	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+6%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	72 MB (total)+140%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	45,784	48,810+7%
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6517P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus 6400 on the Xeon 6517P — the Xeon 6517P supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6517P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 8 (Xeon 6517P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 88 (Xeon 6517P) — the Xeon 6517P offers 68 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and Granite Rapids-SP (Xeon 6517P).

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon 6517P
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	6400+127900%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+4915100%	4096
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	88+340%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon 6517P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6517P). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon 6517P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Xeon 6517P rivals EPYC 9554.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon 6517P
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Xeon 6517P debuted at $1195. On MSRP ($409 vs $1195), the Core i7-13700K is $786 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 40.8 pts/$ for the Xeon 6517P — making the Core i7-13700K the 93.1% better value option.