PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅+42.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $6,088 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Delivers 615.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 15.7 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 330W, a 205W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon 6747P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (18,980 vs 45,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 288 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6747P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.

Xeon 6747P

2025

Why buy it

✅+137.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+860% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅340% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,000 vs 2,846).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.7 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌164% higher power demand at 330W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Xeon 6747P

2025

Why buy it

✅+42.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $6,088 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Delivers 615.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 15.7 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 330W, a 205W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon 6747P needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+137.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+860% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅340% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (18,980 vs 45,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 288 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6747P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (2,000 vs 2,846).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.7 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌164% higher power demand at 330W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Xeon 6747P?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon 6747P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6747P is the better fit. You are getting 137.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 860% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is $6,088 cheaper on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $6,497 MSRP, and it gives you a much larger L3 cache footprint (288 MB vs 30 MB) and 3D V-Cache gaming edge. The trade-off is that Xeon 6747P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 137.1% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 615.2% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 15.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6747P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022), 860% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 30 MB), more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 16/24, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Xeon 6747P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	284 FPS	188 FPS
medium	268 FPS	165 FPS
high	223 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	155 FPS
medium	200 FPS	131 FPS
high	159 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	70 FPS
medium	134 FPS	63 FPS
high	103 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	40 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon 6747P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	689 FPS	520 FPS
medium	580 FPS	460 FPS
high	484 FPS	376 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	309 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	425 FPS
medium	525 FPS	383 FPS
high	441 FPS	321 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	256 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	262 FPS
medium	314 FPS	239 FPS
high	295 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	176 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon 6747P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	648 FPS	849 FPS
medium	530 FPS	768 FPS
high	467 FPS	730 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	641 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	737 FPS
medium	491 FPS	662 FPS
high	427 FPS	626 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	558 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	493 FPS
medium	374 FPS	402 FPS
high	339 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	303 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon 6747P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon 6747P
1080p
low	970 FPS	1034 FPS
medium	883 FPS	916 FPS
high	766 FPS	789 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	670 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	848 FPS
medium	740 FPS	727 FPS
high	642 FPS	623 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	525 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	613 FPS
medium	515 FPS	538 FPS
high	463 FPS	474 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	403 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon 6747P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Xeon 6747P

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon 6747P

The Xeon 6747P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 101,685 points. Launch price was $6,497.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon 6747P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6747P has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon 6747P — a 32.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon 6747P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Xeon 6747P's 101,685 — a 75.8% lead for the Xeon 6747P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 2,000, a 34.9% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 45,000 (81.3% advantage for the Xeon 6747P). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6747P.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon 6747P
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	48 / 96+200%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+38%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+26%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	288 MB (total)+860%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	45,784	101,685+122%
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846+42%	2,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980	45,000+137%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6747P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Xeon 6747P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 8 (Xeon 6747P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 88 (Xeon 6747P) — the Xeon 6747P offers 68 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and C741 (Xeon 6747P).

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon 6747P
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	88+340%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon 6747P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6747P). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon 6747P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon 6747P targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Xeon 6747P rivals EPYC 9555.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon 6747P
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	High Performance Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Xeon 6747P debuted at $6497. On MSRP ($409 vs $6497), the Core i7-13700K is $6088 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 15.7 pts/$ for the Xeon 6747P — making the Core i7-13700K the 150.9% better value option.