
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Xeon E-2436
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon E-2436 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Xeon E-2436 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Xeon E-2436
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,708 vs 45,784).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-13700K
2022Xeon E-2436
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon E-2436 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Xeon E-2436 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,708 vs 45,784).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 30 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Xeon E-2436?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Xeon E-2436 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 182 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 141 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 94 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Xeon E-2436 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 357 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 307 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 218 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Xeon E-2436 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 543 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 543 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 466 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 320 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Xeon E-2436 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 543 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 543 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 543 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 357 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Xeon E-2436

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon E-2436
Xeon E-2436
The Xeon E-2436 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 21,708 points. Launch price was $331.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon E-2436 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5 GHz on the Xeon E-2436 — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E-2436 uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Xeon E-2436's 21,708 — a 71.3% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2436.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Xeon E-2436 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+167% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+8% | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+17% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+67% | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 45,784+111% | 21,708 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Xeon E-2436 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core i7-13700K) / not specified (Xeon E-2436). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon E-2436 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Xeon E-2436 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













