PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +21.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 125W instead of 145W, a 20W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon E5-2699A v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 55 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699A v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2699A v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2699A v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+83.3% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (26,759 vs 45,784).
❌16% higher power demand at 145W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Xeon E5-2699A v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +21.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 125W instead of 145W, a 20W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon E5-2699A v4 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+83.3% larger total L3 cache (55 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 22 cores / 44 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 55 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2699A v4, which brings 22 cores / 44 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $409 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2699A v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (26,759 vs 45,784).
❌16% higher power demand at 145W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Xeon E5-2699A v4?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-2699A v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 21.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 71.1% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is at an unclear MSRP at $409 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 21.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2016), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 22/44. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-2699A v4 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon E5-2699A v4
1080p
low	284 FPS	183 FPS
medium	268 FPS	161 FPS
high	223 FPS	128 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	102 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	153 FPS
medium	200 FPS	129 FPS
high	159 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	69 FPS
medium	134 FPS	62 FPS
high	103 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	39 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon E5-2699A v4

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon E5-2699A v4
1080p
low	689 FPS	364 FPS
medium	580 FPS	330 FPS
high	484 FPS	279 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	226 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	313 FPS
medium	525 FPS	284 FPS
high	441 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	190 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	195 FPS
medium	314 FPS	178 FPS
high	295 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	121 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon E5-2699A v4

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon E5-2699A v4
1080p
low	648 FPS	669 FPS
medium	530 FPS	669 FPS
high	467 FPS	669 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	647 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	669 FPS
medium	491 FPS	617 FPS
high	427 FPS	586 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	530 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	466 FPS
medium	374 FPS	380 FPS
high	339 FPS	345 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	288 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon E5-2699A v4

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon E5-2699A v4
1080p
low	970 FPS	669 FPS
medium	883 FPS	669 FPS
high	766 FPS	669 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	663 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	669 FPS
medium	740 FPS	669 FPS
high	642 FPS	637 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	526 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	633 FPS
medium	515 FPS	557 FPS
high	463 FPS	488 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	405 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon E5-2699A v4

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Xeon E5-2699A v4

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon E5-2699A v4

The Xeon E5-2699A v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 22 cores and 44 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 55 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 145 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,759 points. Launch price was $4,938.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 offers 22 cores / 44 threads — the Xeon E5-2699A v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2699A v4 — a 40% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 uses Broadwell-EP (2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Xeon E5-2699A v4's 26,759 — a 52.5% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 55 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2699A v4.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon E5-2699A v4
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	22 / 44+38%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+50%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+42%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	55 MB (total)+83%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Broadwell-EP (2016)
PassMark	45,784+71%	26,759
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon E5-2699A v4
Socket	LGA1700	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-13700K) / not specified (Xeon E5-2699A v4). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.