PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $6,805 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
✅Delivers 777.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 270W, a 145W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 57 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8368, which brings 38 cores / 76 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Platinum 8368

2021

Why buy it

✅+90% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 38 cores / 76 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (20,000 vs 31,000).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($7,214 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌116% higher power demand at 270W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Xeon Platinum 8368

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +17.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $6,805 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
✅Delivers 777.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 270W, a 145W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅+90% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 38 cores / 76 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 57 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8368, which brings 38 cores / 76 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (20,000 vs 31,000).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($7,214 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌116% higher power demand at 270W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Xeon Platinum 8368?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Platinum 8368 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 17.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 55% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is $6,805 cheaper on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $7,214 MSRP, and it gives you a 17.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 777.3% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 12.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 38/76. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8368 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon Platinum 8368
1080p
low	284 FPS	185 FPS
medium	268 FPS	149 FPS
high	223 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	94 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	154 FPS
medium	200 FPS	120 FPS
high	159 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	74 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	72 FPS
medium	134 FPS	60 FPS
high	103 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	38 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon Platinum 8368

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon Platinum 8368
1080p
low	689 FPS	412 FPS
medium	580 FPS	361 FPS
high	484 FPS	294 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	235 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	353 FPS
medium	525 FPS	314 FPS
high	441 FPS	264 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	203 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	219 FPS
medium	314 FPS	198 FPS
high	295 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	135 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon Platinum 8368

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon Platinum 8368
1080p
low	648 FPS	935 FPS
medium	530 FPS	817 FPS
high	467 FPS	766 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	680 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	746 FPS
medium	491 FPS	643 FPS
high	427 FPS	603 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	535 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	479 FPS
medium	374 FPS	378 FPS
high	339 FPS	334 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	272 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon Platinum 8368

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon Platinum 8368
1080p
low	970 FPS	911 FPS
medium	883 FPS	828 FPS
high	766 FPS	714 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	613 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	712 FPS
medium	740 FPS	625 FPS
high	642 FPS	537 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	460 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	514 FPS
medium	515 FPS	459 FPS
high	463 FPS	403 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	351 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon Platinum 8368

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Xeon Platinum 8368

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon Platinum 8368

The Xeon Platinum 8368 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 92,054 points. Launch price was $7,214.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8368 offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8368 has 22 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368 — a 45.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8368 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Xeon Platinum 8368's 92,054 — a 67.1% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8368. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 31,000 vs 20,000 (43.1% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,846 vs 1,961, a 36.8% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 18,980 vs 25,000 (27.4% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8368). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon Platinum 8368
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	38 / 76+138%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+59%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+42%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	57 MB (total)+90%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	45,784	92,054+101%
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000+55%	20,000
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846+45%	1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980	25,000+32%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8368 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8368 — the Core i7-13700K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8368). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8368) — the Xeon Platinum 8368 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368).

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon Platinum 8368
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	6 TB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8368 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8368). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon Platinum 8368 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8368 targets Server. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Xeon Platinum 8368 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon Platinum 8368
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8368 debuted at $7214. On MSRP ($409 vs $7214), the Core i7-13700K is $6805 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 12.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8368 — making the Core i7-13700K the 159.1% better value option.