PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Delivers 52.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 73.4 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $323 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
26.6% HIGHER MSRP
$409 MSRPvs$323 MSRP

Xeon W-1370P

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $86 less on MSRP ($323 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (23,698 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.4 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($323 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Xeon W-1370P

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Delivers 52.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 73.4 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $323 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Costs $86 less on MSRP ($323 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌
26.6% HIGHER MSRP
$409 MSRPvs$323 MSRP

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (23,698 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 73.4 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($323 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Xeon W-1370P?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-1370P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 19.1% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 93.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is 26.6% more expensive on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $323 MSRP, and it gives you a 19.1% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 52.6% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 73.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 87.5% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 16 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Xeon W-1370P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-1370P
1080p
low	284 FPS	262 FPS
medium	268 FPS	241 FPS
high	223 FPS	201 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	173 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	227 FPS
medium	200 FPS	189 FPS
high	159 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	156 FPS
medium	134 FPS	130 FPS
high	103 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	88 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon W-1370P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-1370P
1080p
low	689 FPS	421 FPS
medium	580 FPS	355 FPS
high	484 FPS	315 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	284 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	375 FPS
medium	525 FPS	326 FPS
high	441 FPS	288 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	250 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	250 FPS
medium	314 FPS	224 FPS
high	295 FPS	217 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	185 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon W-1370P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-1370P
1080p
low	648 FPS	592 FPS
medium	530 FPS	537 FPS
high	467 FPS	461 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	398 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	592 FPS
medium	491 FPS	497 FPS
high	427 FPS	421 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	366 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	427 FPS
medium	374 FPS	370 FPS
high	339 FPS	330 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	280 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon W-1370P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-1370P
1080p
low	970 FPS	592 FPS
medium	883 FPS	592 FPS
high	766 FPS	592 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	592 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	592 FPS
medium	740 FPS	592 FPS
high	642 FPS	592 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	592 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	592 FPS
medium	515 FPS	576 FPS
high	463 FPS	515 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon W-1370P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Xeon W-1370P

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon W-1370P

The Xeon W-1370P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,698 points. Launch price was $428.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-1370P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5.2 GHz on the Xeon W-1370P — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-1370P uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Xeon W-1370P's 23,698 — a 63.6% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1370P.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-1370P
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+4%	5.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	3.6 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)+88%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Rocket Lake-S (2021)
PassMark	45,784+93%	23,698
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-1370P uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-1370P
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-13700K) / not specified (Xeon W-1370P). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon W-1370P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon W-1370P
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	true	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Xeon W-1370P debuted at $323. On MSRP ($409 vs $323), the Xeon W-1370P is $86 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 73.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1370P — making the Core i7-13700K the 41.6% better value option.