PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $980 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $1,389 MSRP).
✅Delivers 243.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 32.6 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $1,389 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 200W, a 75W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon w5-2465X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-2465X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon w5-2465X

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅460% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (45,240 vs 45,784).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.6 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($1,389 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌60% higher power demand at 200W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Xeon w5-2465X

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $980 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $1,389 MSRP).
✅Delivers 243.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 32.6 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $1,389 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 200W, a 75W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon w5-2465X needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅460% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-2465X, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (45,240 vs 45,784).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.6 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($1,389 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌60% higher power demand at 200W vs 125W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Xeon w5-2465X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon w5-2465X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 1.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is $980 cheaper on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $1,389 MSRP, and it gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 243.7% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 32.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w5-2465X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2022) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Xeon w5-2465X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon w5-2465X
1080p
low	284 FPS	201 FPS
medium	268 FPS	167 FPS
high	223 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	109 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	164 FPS
medium	200 FPS	131 FPS
high	159 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	86 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	90 FPS
medium	134 FPS	76 FPS
high	103 FPS	61 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	49 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon w5-2465X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon w5-2465X
1080p
low	689 FPS	589 FPS
medium	580 FPS	493 FPS
high	484 FPS	403 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	364 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	500 FPS
medium	525 FPS	435 FPS
high	441 FPS	366 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	315 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	311 FPS
medium	314 FPS	272 FPS
high	295 FPS	249 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	220 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon w5-2465X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon w5-2465X
1080p
low	648 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	530 FPS	1131 FPS
high	467 FPS	1131 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	875 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	491 FPS	953 FPS
high	427 FPS	859 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	656 FPS
medium	374 FPS	552 FPS
high	339 FPS	493 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	419 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon w5-2465X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon w5-2465X
1080p
low	970 FPS	1131 FPS
medium	883 FPS	1015 FPS
high	766 FPS	901 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	784 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	926 FPS
medium	740 FPS	795 FPS
high	642 FPS	700 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	601 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	663 FPS
medium	515 FPS	574 FPS
high	463 FPS	514 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon w5-2465X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Xeon w5-2465X

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon w5-2465X

The Xeon w5-2465X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 33.75 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 45,240 points. Launch price was $1,389.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the Xeon w5-2465X's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 4.7 GHz on the Xeon w5-2465X — a 13.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon w5-2465X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Xeon w5-2465X's 45,240 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 33.75 MB on the Xeon w5-2465X.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon w5-2465X
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	16 / 32
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+15%	4.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+10%	3.1 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	33.75 MB+13%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	45,784+1%	45,240
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w5-2465X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus 4800 on the Xeon w5-2465X — the Xeon w5-2465X supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w5-2465X supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 8 (Xeon w5-2465X). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 112 (Xeon w5-2465X) — the Xeon w5-2465X offers 92 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and W790 (Xeon w5-2465X).

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon w5-2465X
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	4800+95900%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+4915100%	4096
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	112+460%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Xeon w5-2465X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w5-2465X). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon w5-2465X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Xeon w5-2465X rivals Threadripper PRO 7955WX.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon w5-2465X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	None
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Xeon w5-2465X debuted at $1389. On MSRP ($409 vs $1389), the Core i7-13700K is $980 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 32.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-2465X — making the Core i7-13700K the 109.8% better value option.