Core i7-13700KF vs EPYC 73F3

CPU

GPU

Core i7-13700KF

16 Cores24 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2022

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 73F3

16 Cores32 Thrd240 WWMax: 4 GHz2021

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i7-13700KF vs EPYC 73F3 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-13700KF

16 / 24

45,730

0.0%

46,103

+0.8%

Ryzen 7 5800

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13700KF vs EPYC 73F3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13700KF vs EPYC 73F3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13700KF

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,137 less on MSRP ($384 MSRP vs $3,521 MSRP).
✅Delivers 809.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 119.1 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $3,521 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 240W, a 115W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (45,730 vs 46,103).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 73F3, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 73F3

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅+753.3% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700KF across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.1 vs 119.1 PassMark/$ ($3,521 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
❌92% higher power demand at 240W vs 125W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700KF moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700KF better than EPYC 73F3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 73F3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700KF is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 73F3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 753.3% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 30 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700KF is the better buy right now. Core i7-13700KF comes in $3,137 cheaper on MSRP at $384 MSRP versus $3,521 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 73F3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. It is also 809.5% better value on MSRP (119.1 vs 13.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700KF makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of SP3. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13700KF vs EPYC 73F3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700KF

The Core i7-13700KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 W, 253 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 45,730 points. Launch price was $384.

EPYC 73F3

The EPYC 73F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 240 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,103 points. Launch price was $3,521.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700KF packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the EPYC 73F3's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700KF versus 4 GHz on the EPYC 73F3 — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700KF (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-13700KF uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 73F3 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700KF scores 45,730 against the EPYC 73F3's 46,103 — a 0.8% lead for the EPYC 73F3. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700KF vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 73F3.

Feature	Core i7-13700KF	EPYC 73F3
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	16 / 32
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+35%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	3.5 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	256 MB (total)+753%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm+
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark	45,730	46,103
Cinebench R23 Multi	30,766	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,962	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	17,708	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700KF uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 73F3 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i7-13700KF versus 3200 on the EPYC 73F3 — the Core i7-13700KF supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 73F3 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700KF) vs 8 (EPYC 73F3). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700KF) vs 128 (EPYC 73F3) — the EPYC 73F3 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i7-13700KF) and SP3,C621A (EPYC 73F3).

Feature	Core i7-13700KF	EPYC 73F3
Socket	LGA1700	SP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	5600+75%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	192	4096+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-13700KF has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 73F3 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700KF rivals Ryzen 7 7700X; EPYC 73F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.

Feature	Core i7-13700KF	EPYC 73F3
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-13700KF was priced at $384, while the EPYC 73F3 came in at $3521. On launch pricing ($384 vs $3521), Core i7-13700KF was $3137 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700KF delivers 119.1 pts/$ vs 13.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 73F3 — making the Core i7-13700KF the 160.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-13700KF	EPYC 73F3
MSRP	$384-89%	$3521
Performance per Dollar	119.1+809%	13.1
Release Date	2022	2021

Search Core i7-13700KF on Amazon

Search EPYC 73F3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.