Core i7-13700KF
EPYC 7402
Core i7-13700KF vs EPYC 7402 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-13700KF vs EPYC 7402 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-13700KF vs EPYC 7402: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-13700KF
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,399 less on MSRP ($384 MSRP vs $1,783 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 361.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 119.1 vs 25.8 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $1,783 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 180W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7402, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 7402
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700KF across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (28,546 vs 30,766).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.8 vs 119.1 PassMark/$ ($1,783 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
- ❌44% higher power demand at 180W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700KF moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700KF better than EPYC 7402?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-13700KF vs EPYC 7402 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core i7-13700KF
The Core i7-13700KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 W, 253 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 45,730 points. Launch price was $384.
EPYC 7402
The EPYC 7402 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 46,012 points. Launch price was $1,783.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700KF packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 7402 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7402 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700KF versus 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7402 — a 46.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700KF (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-13700KF uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7402 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700KF scores 45,730 against the EPYC 7402's 46,012 — a 0.6% lead for the EPYC 7402. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 30,766 vs 28,546 (7.5% advantage for the Core i7-13700KF). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,962 vs 1,299, a 40.7% lead for the Core i7-13700KF that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 17,708 vs 12,622 (33.5% advantage for the Core i7-13700KF). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700KF vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7402.
| Feature | Core i7-13700KF | EPYC 7402 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+61% | 3.35 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+21% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+7% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 45,730 | 46,012 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 30,766+8% | 28,546 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,962+51% | 1,299 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 17,708+40% | 12,622 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700KF uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7402 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i7-13700KF versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7402 — the Core i7-13700KF supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7402 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700KF) vs 8 (EPYC 7402). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700KF) vs 128 (EPYC 7402) — the EPYC 7402 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i7-13700KF) and SP3,Rome (EPYC 7402).
| Feature | Core i7-13700KF | EPYC 7402 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+75% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4096 GB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-13700KF has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13700KF) vs AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU (EPYC 7402). Primary use case: EPYC 7402 targets Server / Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700KF rivals Ryzen 7 7700X; EPYC 7402 rivals Xeon Gold 6242.
| Feature | Core i7-13700KF | EPYC 7402 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, SEV, IOMMU |
| Target Use | — | Server / Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-13700KF was priced at $384, while the EPYC 7402 came in at $1783. On launch pricing ($384 vs $1783), Core i7-13700KF was $1399 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700KF delivers 119.1 pts/$ vs 25.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 7402 — making the Core i7-13700KF the 128.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700KF | EPYC 7402 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $384-78% | $1783 |
| Performance per Dollar | 119.1+362% | 25.8 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-13700KF and EPYC 7402
