Core i7-13700KF vs Xeon w5-3525

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13700KF vs Xeon w5-3525 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13700KF vs Xeon w5-3525: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13700KF

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $955 less on MSRP ($384 MSRP vs $1,339 MSRP).
✅Delivers 251.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 119.1 vs 33.8 PassMark/$ ($384 MSRP vs $1,339 MSRP).
✅Draws 125W instead of 290W, a 165W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (30 MB vs 45 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-3525, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon w5-3525

2024

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 30 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅460% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (45,311 vs 45,730).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 33.8 vs 119.1 PassMark/$ ($1,339 MSRP vs $384 MSRP).
❌132% higher power demand at 290W vs 125W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700KF better than Xeon w5-3525?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon w5-3525 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700KF is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700KF is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700KF is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700KF is the better buy right now. Core i7-13700KF comes in $955 cheaper on MSRP at $384 MSRP versus $1,339 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 251.9% better value on MSRP (119.1 vs 33.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w5-3525 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2022), 50% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 30 MB), and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13700KF vs Xeon w5-3525 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700KF

The Core i7-13700KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 W, 253 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 45,730 points. Launch price was $384.

Xeon w5-3525

The Xeon w5-3525 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 45,311 points. Launch price was $1,339.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700KF packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the Xeon w5-3525's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700KF versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w5-3525 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700KF (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-13700KF uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon w5-3525 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700KF scores 45,730 against the Xeon w5-3525's 45,311 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-13700KF. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700KF vs 45 MB on the Xeon w5-3525.

Feature	Core i7-13700KF	Xeon w5-3525
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	16 / 32
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+13%	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+6%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	45 MB+50%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	45,730	45,311
Cinebench R23 Multi	30,766	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,962	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	17,708	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700KF uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon w5-3525 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Core i7-13700KF versus 4800 on the Xeon w5-3525 — the Core i7-13700KF supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w5-3525 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700KF) vs 8 (Xeon w5-3525). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700KF) vs 112 (Xeon w5-3525) — the Xeon w5-3525 offers 92 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760 (Core i7-13700KF) and W790 (Xeon w5-3525).

Feature	Core i7-13700KF	Xeon w5-3525
Socket	LGA1700	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	5600+17%	4800
Max RAM Capacity	192	4096+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	112+460%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Xeon w5-3525 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700KF rivals Ryzen 7 7700X; Xeon w5-3525 rivals Threadripper PRO 7955WX.

Feature	Core i7-13700KF	Xeon w5-3525
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-13700KF was priced at $384, while the Xeon w5-3525 came in at $1339. On launch pricing ($384 vs $1339), Core i7-13700KF was $955 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700KF delivers 119.1 pts/$ vs 33.8 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-3525 — making the Core i7-13700KF the 111.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-13700KF	Xeon w5-3525
MSRP	$384-71%	$1339
Performance per Dollar	119.1+252%	33.8
Release Date	2022	2024

Search Core i7-13700KF on Amazon

Search Xeon w5-3525 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.