PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13700TE vs Core i9-10900KF FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13700TE vs Core i9-10900KF: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13700TE

2023

Why buy it

✅+8% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Costs $119 less on MSRP ($390 MSRP vs $509 MSRP).
✅Delivers 29.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.5 vs 43.7 PassMark/$ ($390 MSRP vs $509 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-10900KF across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Core i9-10900KF

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,261 vs 10,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 43.7 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($509 MSRP vs $390 MSRP).
❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700TE better than Core i9-10900KF?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i9-10900KF is ahead with a 6.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700TE pulls ahead with 8% better Geekbench multi-core. Core i7-13700TE also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 8% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700TE is the better buy right now. Core i7-13700TE comes in $119 cheaper on MSRP at $390 MSRP versus $509 MSRP, and it still gives you 8% better Geekbench multi-core. The compromise is that Core i9-10900KF is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 29.3% better value on MSRP (56.5 vs 43.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1200 + DDR4 setup, Core i9-10900KF can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, 50% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 20 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 10/20. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13700TE vs Core i9-10900KF Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700TE

The Core i7-13700TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,026 points. Launch price was $299.

Core i9-10900KF

The Core i9-10900KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 22,231 points. Launch price was $509.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700TE packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Core i9-10900KF offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Core i7-13700TE has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-13700TE versus 5.2 GHz on the Core i9-10900KF — a 8% clock advantage for the Core i9-10900KF (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i7-13700TE uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i9-10900KF uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700TE scores 22,026 against the Core i9-10900KF's 22,231 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i9-10900KF. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,000 vs 1,767, a 12.4% lead for the Core i7-13700TE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,000 vs 9,261 (7.7% advantage for the Core i7-13700TE). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700TE vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i9-10900KF.

Feature	Core i7-13700TE	Core i9-10900KF
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+60%	10 / 20
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz	5.2 GHz+8%
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	3.7 GHz+236%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)+50%	20 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+700%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark	22,026	22,231
Geekbench 6 Single	2,000+13%	1,767
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,000+8%	9,261

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-10900KF uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700TE versus DDR4-2933 on the Core i9-10900KF — the Core i7-13700TE supports 90.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700TE) vs 16 (Core i9-10900KF) — the Core i7-13700TE offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 Series,Intel 700 Series (Core i7-13700TE) and LGA1200 (Core i9-10900KF).

Feature	Core i7-13700TE	Core i9-10900KF
Socket	LGA1700	LGA1200
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+91%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	20+25%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-10900KF has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: Yes (Core i7-13700TE) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-10900KF). The Core i7-13700TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i9-10900KF requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-13700TE targets Embedded.

Feature	Core i7-13700TE	Core i9-10900KF
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	Yes	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Embedded	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-13700TE was priced at $390, while the Core i9-10900KF came in at $509. On launch pricing ($390 vs $509), Core i7-13700TE was $119 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700TE delivers 56.5 pts/$ vs 43.7 pts/$ for the Core i9-10900KF — making the Core i7-13700TE the 25.6% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-13700TE	Core i9-10900KF
MSRP	$390-23%	$509
Performance per Dollar	56.5+29%	43.7
Release Date	2023	2020

Search Core i7-13700TE on Amazon

Search Core i9-10900KF on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.