Core i7-13700TE vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950

CPU

GPU

Core i7-13700TE

16 Cores24 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Core family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen Threadripper 1950

16 Cores32 Thrd180 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2017

Threadripper family

···

Buy on Amazon

Core i7-13700TE vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-13700TE

16 / 24

22,026

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 1950

16 / 32

22,077

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13700TE vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13700TE vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13700TE

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $609 less on MSRP ($390 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 155.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.5 vs 22.1 PassMark/$ ($390 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 180W, a 145W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (10,000 vs 10,100).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1950, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950

2017

Why buy it

✅+1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.1 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $390 MSRP).
❌414.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700TE better than Ryzen Threadripper 1950?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Ryzen Threadripper 1950 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700TE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700TE is the better buy right now. Core i7-13700TE comes in $609 cheaper on MSRP at $390 MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 155.6% better value on MSRP (56.5 vs 22.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of SP3r2. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13700TE vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700TE

The Core i7-13700TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,026 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950

The Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,077 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700TE packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the Ryzen Threadripper 1950's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-13700TE versus 3.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 — a 40% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700TE (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-13700TE uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700TE scores 22,026 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1950's 22,077 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,000 vs 1,961, a 2% lead for the Core i7-13700TE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,000 vs 10,100 (1% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950). L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700TE vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950.

Feature	Core i7-13700TE	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	16 / 32
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+50%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	1.1 GHz	3.2 GHz+191%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	32 MB+7%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	22,026	22,077
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	18,780
Geekbench 6 Single	2,000+2%	1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,000	10,100+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700TE versus DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 — the Core i7-13700TE supports 110.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700TE) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700TE) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950) — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 Series,Intel 700 Series (Core i7-13700TE) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950).

Feature	Core i7-13700TE	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Socket	LGA1700	SP3r2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+110%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: Yes (Core i7-13700TE) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 1950). The Core i7-13700TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-13700TE targets Embedded, Ryzen Threadripper 1950 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 1950 rivals Core i9-7960X.

Feature	Core i7-13700TE	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	Yes	AMD-V
Target Use	Embedded	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-13700TE was priced at $390, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 came in at $999. On launch pricing ($390 vs $999), Core i7-13700TE was $609 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700TE delivers 56.5 pts/$ vs 22.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 — making the Core i7-13700TE the 87.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-13700TE	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP	$390-61%	$999
Performance per Dollar	56.5+156%	22.1
Release Date	2023	2017

Search Core i7-13700TE on Amazon

Search Ryzen Threadripper 1950 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.