
Core i7-14700K

Xeon Gold 6348
Core i7-14700K vs Xeon Gold 6348 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-14700K vs Xeon Gold 6348 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-14700K vs Xeon Gold 6348: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-14700K
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,174 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $3,583 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 782.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 14.5 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $3,583 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 235W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (33 MB vs 42 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6348, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 6348
2021Why buy it
- ✅+27.3% larger total L3 cache (42 MB vs 33 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-14700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (51,843 vs 52,228).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($3,583 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌88% higher power demand at 235W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Core i7-14700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-14700K better than Xeon Gold 6348?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-14700K vs Xeon Gold 6348 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-14700K
The Core i7-14700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 52,228 points. Launch price was $319.

Xeon Gold 6348
The Xeon Gold 6348 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 42 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 235 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 51,843 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i7-14700K packs 20 cores / 28 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6348 offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Gold 6348 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Core i7-14700K versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6348 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-14700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-14700K uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6348 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-14700K scores 52,228 against the Xeon Gold 6348's 51,843 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-14700K. L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-14700K vs 42 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6348.
| Feature | Core i7-14700K | Xeon Gold 6348 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 28 | 28 / 56+40% |
| Boost Clock | 5.6 GHz+60% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+31% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 33 MB (total) | 42 MB (total)+27% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 52,228 | 51,843 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 36,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,900 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 21,500 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-14700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6348 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-14700K versus 3200 on the Xeon Gold 6348 — the Core i7-14700K supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6348 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-14700K) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6348). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-14700K) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6348) — the Xeon Gold 6348 offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,H770,B760,Z690,H670,B660,H610 (Core i7-14700K) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6348).
| Feature | Core i7-14700K | Xeon Gold 6348 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+75% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4096 GB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 64+220% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-14700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 6348 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-14700K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6348). The Core i7-14700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon Gold 6348 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-14700K targets High-End Gaming/Creation. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6348 rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | Core i7-14700K | Xeon Gold 6348 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High-End Gaming/Creation | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-14700K was priced at $409, while the Xeon Gold 6348 came in at $3583. On launch pricing ($409 vs $3583), Core i7-14700K was $3174 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-14700K delivers 127.7 pts/$ vs 14.5 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6348 — making the Core i7-14700K the 159.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-14700K | Xeon Gold 6348 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-89% | $3583 |
| Performance per Dollar | 127.7+781% | 14.5 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















