Core i7-2617M
VS
A6-7400K

Core i7-2617M vs A6-7400K

Intel

Core i7-2617M

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2011
VS
AMD

A6-7400K

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2617M is positioned at rank 287 and the A6-7400K is on rank 869, so the Core i7-2617M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2617M

#82
Core i7-11700B
MSRP: $323|Avg: $311
99%
#83
Core i7-13700HX
MSRP: $485|Avg: N/A
98%
#86
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
97%
#274
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
435%
#275
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
428%
#276
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
393%
#277
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
392%
#278
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
388%
#280
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
375%
#281
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
359%
#282
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
359%
#283
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
349%
#287
Core i7-2617M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-7400K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
18767%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
17733%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12875%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3879%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3072%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2688%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1539%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1519%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1383%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1383%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1368%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1331%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1312%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1307%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1295%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
99%
#869
A6-7400K
MSRP: $101|Avg: $43
100%
#870
Core i7-4765T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
100%
#871
Core i7-4770TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $303
100%
#872
Core i5-4570T
MSRP: $195|Avg: $45
100%
#873
Athlon II X2 260u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#875
A4-3420
MSRP: $65|Avg: $30
99%
#876
Core i5-5675R
MSRP: $339|Avg: $392
99%
#877
Pentium G3470
MSRP: $150|Avg: $130
98%
#878
Core i5-3335S
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
98%
#879
Core i5-3470T
MSRP: $184|Avg: $35
98%
#881
Pentium G6960
MSRP: $89|Avg: $15
97%
#882
Core i5-2500T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
97%
#884
Athlon II X2 265
MSRP: $83|Avg: $15
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A6-7400K leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-2617M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-2617MA6-7400K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($43)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-2617MA6-7400K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($43)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2617M and A6-7400K

Intel

Core i7-2617M

The Core i7-2617M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,687 points. Launch price was $100.

AMD

A6-7400K

The A6-7400K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,678 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

The Core i7-2617M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the A6-7400K's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core i7-2617M versus 3.9 GHz on the A6-7400K — a 40% clock advantage for the A6-7400K (base: 1.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-2617M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the A6-7400K uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2617M scores 1,687 against the A6-7400K's 1,678 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-2617M.

FeatureCore i7-2617MA6-7400K
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz
3.9 GHz+50%
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
3.5 GHz+133%
L3 Cache
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB
1024 kB+100%
Process
32 nm
28 nm-13%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Kaveri (2014−2015)
PassMark
1,687
1,678
Geekbench 6 Single
448
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2617M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A6-7400K uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-2617M versus 1866 on the A6-7400K — the A6-7400K supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-7400K supports up to 32 of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67,UM67 (Core i7-2617M) and FM2+ (A6-7400K).

FeatureCore i7-2617MA6-7400K
Socket
BGA1023
FM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
1866+62100%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB+26214300%
32
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A6-7400K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2617M) vs true (A6-7400K). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2617M) and Radeon R5 Graphics (A6-7400K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2617M targets Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i7-2617M rivals A6-3400M; A6-7400K rivals Pentium G3420.

FeatureCore i7-2617MA6-7400K
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Radeon R5 Graphics
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
true
Target Use
Ultrabook