Core i7-2617M
VS
A8-4500M

Core i7-2617M vs A8-4500M

Intel

Core i7-2617M

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2011
VS
AMD

A8-4500M

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2617M is positioned at rank 287 and the A8-4500M is on rank 728, so the Core i7-2617M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2617M

#82
Core i7-11700B
MSRP: $323|Avg: $311
99%
#83
Core i7-13700HX
MSRP: $485|Avg: N/A
98%
#86
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
97%
#274
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
435%
#275
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
428%
#276
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
393%
#277
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
392%
#278
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
388%
#280
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
375%
#281
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
359%
#282
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
359%
#283
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
349%
#287
Core i7-2617M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A8-4500M

#716
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1040%
#717
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1024%
#718
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
940%
#719
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
936%
#720
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
928%
#722
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
896%
#723
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
859%
#724
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
858%
#725
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
835%
#728
A8-4500M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-2617M leads in gaming performance. However, the A8-4500M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-2617MA8-4500M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-2617MA8-4500M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2617M and A8-4500M

Intel

Core i7-2617M

The Core i7-2617M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,687 points. Launch price was $100.

AMD

A8-4500M

The A8-4500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: unknown. Passmark benchmark score: 1,693 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

The Core i7-2617M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the A8-4500M offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A8-4500M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core i7-2617M versus 2.8 GHz on the A8-4500M — a 7.4% clock advantage for the A8-4500M (base: 1.5 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core i7-2617M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the A8-4500M uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2617M scores 1,687 against the A8-4500M's 1,693 — a 0.4% lead for the A8-4500M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 448 vs 283, a 45.1% lead for the Core i7-2617M that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-2617M vs 0 kB on the A8-4500M.

FeatureCore i7-2617MA8-4500M
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz
2.8 GHz+8%
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
1.9 GHz+27%
L3 Cache
4 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
4 MB (total)+700%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,687
1,693
Geekbench 6 Single
448+58%
283
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2617M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A8-4500M uses FS1r2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The A8-4500M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore i7-2617MA8-4500M
Socket
BGA1023
FS1r2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2617M) vs AMD-V (A8-4500M). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2617M) and Radeon HD 7640G (A8-4500M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2617M targets Ultrabook, A8-4500M targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-2617M rivals A6-3400M; A8-4500M rivals Core i3-3110M.

FeatureCore i7-2617MA8-4500M
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Radeon HD 7640G
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V
Target Use
Ultrabook
Mainstream Laptop