
Core i7-2637M

Ryzen 7 3700X
Core i7-2637M vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-2637M vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-2637M vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-2637M
2011Why buy it
- β Costs $40 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β Draws 17W instead of 65W, a 48W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (1,889 vs 22,430).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 32 MB).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 6.5 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($289 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +462.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
- β Delivers 943.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 6.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
- β 50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- β13.8% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
- β282.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 17W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i7-2637M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Core i7-2637M?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-2637M vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2637M
The Core i7-2637M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,889 points. Launch price was $289.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Core i7-2637M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Ryzen 7 3700X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-2637M versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X β a 44.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 1.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-2637M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2637M scores 1,889 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 β a 168.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-2637M vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Core i7-2637M | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 8 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | 4.4 GHz+57% |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | 3.6 GHz+112% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) |
| PassMark | 1,889 | 22,430+1087% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 350 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 628 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-2637M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Core i7-2637M versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X β the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 140.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB β 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-2637M) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) β the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67 (Core i7-2637M) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | Core i7-2637M | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1023 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333 | DDR4-3200+140% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core i7-2637M) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The Core i7-2637M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i7-2637M | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | true | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-2637M was priced at $289, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($289 vs $329), Core i7-2637M was $40 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-2637M delivers 6.5 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X β making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 165% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-2637M | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289-12% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.5 | 68.2+949% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














