Core i7-2657M
VS
Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Core i7-2657M vs Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Intel

Core i7-2657M

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2011
VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core i7-2657M is positioned at rank #268 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2657M

#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
100%
#256
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
420%
#257
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
414%
#258
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
380%
#259
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
378%
#260
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
375%
#262
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
362%
#263
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
347%
#264
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
347%
#265
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
337%
#268
Core i7-2657M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#277
Core 2 Extreme X9100
MSRP: $851|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Embedded V1202B

#304
Celeron G5900
MSRP: $50|Avg: $42
109%
#304
Core i7-6950X
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $180
17%
#305
Core 5 120
MSRP: $340|Avg: $340
109%
#306
Core i7-12700T
MSRP: $339|Avg: $337
107%
#307
Core 3 100HL
MSRP: $306|Avg: $280
107%
#308
Core i9-11900F
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $358.87
105%
#309
Core i9-9900T
MSRP: $423|Avg: $215
105%
#310
Core i5-9500T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $132
105%
#311
Ryzen 7 PRO 5750GE
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
103%
#312
Core i9-10940X
MSRP: $784|Avg: $460
103%
#313
Core i9-10920X
MSRP: $689|Avg: $430
103%
#314
Core i7-10700
MSRP: $365|Avg: $268
102%
#315
Core i5-9600K
MSRP: $263|Avg: $178
102%
#316
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1400
102%
#317
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
102%
#318
Core i3-10305T
MSRP: $143|Avg: $143
102%
#319
Ryzen Embedded V1202B
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
100%
#320
Core i3-10100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $146
100%
#321
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
100%
#322
Celeron G6900
MSRP: $52|Avg: $77
99%
#323
Core i9-11900K
MSRP: $539|Avg: $435
98%
#324
Core i7-12700TE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $350
96%
#325
Core i9-12900E
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
96%
#326
Celeron G4900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $40
96%
#327
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $452
95%
#328
Core i9-9900KS
MSRP: $513|Avg: $350
95%
#329
Core i5-11600T
MSRP: $262|Avg: $262
94%
#330
Core i9-9900K
MSRP: $488|Avg: $331
93%
#331
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
MSRP: $899|Avg: $540
93%
#332
Celeron G4930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
93%
#333
Core i9-9920X
MSRP: $1189|Avg: $464
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen Embedded V1202B (2018) utilizes 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Dual-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i7-2657MRyzen Embedded V1202B
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($60)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-2657M (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i7-2657MRyzen Embedded V1202B
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($60)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2657M and Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Intel

Core i7-2657M

The Core i7-2657M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,491 points. Launch price was $317.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

The Ryzen Embedded V1202B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,512 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-2657M and Ryzen Embedded V1202B share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i7-2657M versus 3.2 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1202B — a 16.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded V1202B (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i7-2657M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V1202B uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2657M scores 3,491 against the Ryzen Embedded V1202B's 3,512 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen Embedded V1202B. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-2657M vs 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1202B.

FeatureCore i7-2657MRyzen Embedded V1202B
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz
3.2 GHz+19%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2.3 GHz+44%
L3 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB
512K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
3,491
3,512
Geekbench 6 Single
535
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2657M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V1202B uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-2657MRyzen Embedded V1202B
Socket
BGA1023
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2657M) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V1202B). The Core i7-2657M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Ryzen Embedded V1202B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2657M targets Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i7-2657M rivals A6-3420M.

FeatureCore i7-2657MRyzen Embedded V1202B
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Ultrabook