
Core i7-2720QM

Opteron 6234
Core i7-2720QM vs Opteron 6234 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-2720QM vs Opteron 6234 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-2720QM vs Opteron 6234: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-2720QM
2011Why buy it
- β Draws 45W instead of 115W, a 70W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Opteron 6234 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 6234 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (4,015 vs 4,072).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6234, which brings 12 cores / 12 threads.
- β0.3% HIGHER MSRP$378 MSRPvs$377 MSRP
Opteron 6234
2011Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 12 threads.
- β Costs $1 less on MSRP ($377 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- β155.6% higher power demand at 115W vs 45W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i7-2720QM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Opteron 6234 better than Core i7-2720QM?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-2720QM vs Opteron 6234 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2720QM
The Core i7-2720QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,015 points. Launch price was $378.

Opteron 6234
The Opteron 6234 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011β2012) architecture. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,072 points. Launch price was $377.
Processing Power
The Core i7-2720QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6234 offers 12 cores / 12 threads β the Opteron 6234 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-2720QM versus 3 GHz on the Opteron 6234 β a 9.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-2720QM (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-2720QM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Opteron 6234 uses Interlagos (2011β2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2720QM scores 4,015 against the Opteron 6234's 4,072 β a 1.4% lead for the Opteron 6234. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2720QM vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6234.
| Feature | Core i7-2720QM | Opteron 6234 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 12 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz+10% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+12700% | 2 MB (per module) |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) | Interlagos (2011β2012) |
| PassMark | 4,015 | 4,072+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 700 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,600 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-2720QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Opteron 6234 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-2720QM | Opteron 6234 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | G34 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-2720QM) / not specified (Opteron 6234). The Core i7-2720QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Opteron 6234 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2720QM targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-2720QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.
| Feature | Core i7-2720QM | Opteron 6234 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | β |
| Target Use | Performance Laptop | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-2720QM was priced at $378, while the Opteron 6234 came in at $377. On launch pricing ($378 vs $377), Opteron 6234 was $1 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-2720QM delivers 10.6 pts/$ vs 10.8 pts/$ for the Opteron 6234 β making the Opteron 6234 the 1.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-2720QM | Opteron 6234 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $378 | $377 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.6 | 10.8+2% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















