Celeron N5095 vs Core i7-2720QM

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N5095 vs Core i7-2720QM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N5095 vs Core i7-2720QM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N5095

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 45W, a 44W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2720QM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (4,013 vs 4,015).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2720QM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-2720QM

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Celeron N5095 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $378 MSRP, while Celeron N5095 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2900% higher power demand at 45W vs 1.5W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-2720QM better than Celeron N5095?

Yes. Core i7-2720QM is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 11.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-2720QM is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 11.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-2720QM is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-2720QM is the better buy right now. Core i7-2720QM comes in at an unclear MSRP at $378 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 11.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N5095 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N5095 vs Core i7-2720QM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N5095

The Celeron N5095 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,013 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i7-2720QM

The Core i7-2720QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,015 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N5095 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core i7-2720QM's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N5095 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-2720QM — a 12.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-2720QM (base: 2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Celeron N5095 uses the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-2720QM uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N5095 scores 4,013 against the Core i7-2720QM's 4,015 — a 0% lead for the Core i7-2720QM. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron N5095 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2720QM.

Feature	Celeron N5095	Core i7-2720QM
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3.3 GHz+14%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.2 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	4 MB	6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	256K (per core)+16967%
Process	10 nm-69%	32 nm
Architecture	Jasper Lake (2021)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	4,013	4,015
Geekbench 6 Single	—	700
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	2,600

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N5095 uses the BGA1338 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-2720QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N5095	Core i7-2720QM
Socket	BGA1338	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+100%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	—	32 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N5095) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-2720QM). The Core i7-2720QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Celeron N5095 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2720QM targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-2720QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.