Celeron N5095
VS
Opteron 6212

Celeron N5095 vs Opteron 6212

Intel

Celeron N5095

4 Cores4 Thrd1.5 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2021
VS
AMD

Opteron 6212

8 Cores8 Thrd115 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 6212

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
2092%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
395%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
351%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
271%
#67
EPYC 4545P
MSRP: $549|Avg: $595
99%
#71
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
MSRP: $400|Avg: $343
88%
#73
EPYC 4484PX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
85%
#88
Opteron 6212
MSRP: $266|Avg: N/A
100%
#90
Opteron 4334
MSRP: $204|Avg: $130
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron N5095 (2021) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron N5095Opteron 6212
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($266)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Jasper Lake (2021) / 10 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Interlagos (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Opteron 6212 (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron N5095Opteron 6212
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($266)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N5095 and Opteron 6212

Intel

Celeron N5095

The Celeron N5095 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,013 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Opteron 6212

The Opteron 6212 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,973 points. Launch price was $266.

Processing Power

The Celeron N5095 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 6212 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 6212 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N5095 versus 3.2 GHz on the Opteron 6212 — a 9.8% clock advantage for the Opteron 6212 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Celeron N5095 uses the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Opteron 6212 uses Interlagos (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N5095 scores 4,013 against the Opteron 6212's 3,973 — a 1% lead for the Celeron N5095. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron N5095 vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6212.

FeatureCeleron N5095Opteron 6212
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz
3.2 GHz+10%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.6 GHz+30%
L3 Cache
4 MB
8 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB
2 MB (per module)+33%
Process
10 nm-69%
32 nm
Architecture
Jasper Lake (2021)
Interlagos (2011−2012)
PassMark
4,013+1%
3,973
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N5095 uses the BGA1338 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Opteron 6212 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron N5095Opteron 6212
Socket
BGA1338
G34
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+100%
PCIe 2.0