Celeron N5095 vs Core i5-4590T

Intel

Celeron N5095

4 Cores4 Thrd1.5 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2021
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-4590T

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······

Celeron N5095 vs Core i5-4590T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N5095 vs Core i5-4590T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N5095 vs Core i5-4590T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N5095

2021

Why buy it

  • Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-4590T across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (4,013 vs 4,064).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4590T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-4590T.

Core i5-4590T

2014

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Celeron N5095 needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron N5095.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $192 MSRP, while Celeron N5095 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 2233.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 1.5W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4590T better than Celeron N5095?
Yes. Core i5-4590T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.5% average FPS lead across 36 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-4590T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.5% more average FPS across 36 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4590T is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-4590T is the better buy right now. Core i5-4590T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $192 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.5% average FPS lead across 36 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (21.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron N5095 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N5095 vs Core i5-4590T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron N5095

The Celeron N5095 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,013 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-4590T

The Core i5-4590T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,064 points. Launch price was $192.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N5095 and Core i5-4590T share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N5095 versus 3 GHz on the Core i5-4590T — a 3.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-4590T (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron N5095 uses the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-4590T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N5095 scores 4,013 against the Core i5-4590T's 4,064 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i5-4590T. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron N5095 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-4590T.

FeatureCeleron N5095Core i5-4590T
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz
3 GHz+3%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB
6 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+500%
256 kB (per core)
Process
10 nm-55%
22 nm
Architecture
Jasper Lake (2021)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
4,013
4,064+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
917
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N5095 uses the BGA1338 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-4590T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron N5095Core i5-4590T
Socket
BGA1338
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N5095) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-4590T). The Core i5-4590T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Celeron N5095 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4590T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-4590T rivals A8-7600.

FeatureCeleron N5095Core i5-4590T
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Low Power Desktop