Celeron N5095 vs Core i7-7660U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N5095 vs Core i7-7660U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N5095 vs Core i7-7660U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N5095

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 15W, a 14W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,013 vs 4,059).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-7660U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-7660U

2017

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Plus 640, while Celeron N5095 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌900% higher power demand at 15W vs 1.5W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-7660U better than Celeron N5095?

Yes. Core i7-7660U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-7660U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7660U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-7660U still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-7660U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N5095 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N5095 vs Core i7-7660U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N5095

The Celeron N5095 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,013 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i7-7660U

The Core i7-7660U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,059 points. Launch price was $415.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N5095 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-7660U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron N5095 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N5095 versus 4 GHz on the Core i7-7660U — a 31.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-7660U (base: 2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron N5095 uses the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-7660U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N5095 scores 4,013 against the Core i7-7660U's 4,059 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-7660U. Both processors carry 4 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron N5095	Core i7-7660U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	4 GHz+38%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.5 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	4 MB	4 MB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+200%	512 kB
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Jasper Lake (2021)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	4,013	4,059+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	1,759
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,150
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	2,285

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N5095 uses the BGA1338 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-7660U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron N5095	Core i7-7660U
Socket	BGA1338	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity	—	32 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Celeron N5095) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-7660U). The Core i7-7660U includes integrated graphics (Iris Plus 640), while the Celeron N5095 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-7660U targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i7-7660U rivals Core i5-8250U.