Atom x7433RE vs Celeron N5095

Intel

Atom x7433RE

4 Cores4 Thrd9 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Celeron N5095

4 Cores4 Thrd1.5 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2021
Similar parts
·······

Atom x7433RE vs Celeron N5095 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7433RE vs Celeron N5095 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7433RE vs Celeron N5095: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7433RE

2024

Why buy it

  • +50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
  • Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1338 and DDR4.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (9 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics (32EU), while Celeron N5095 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • 500% higher power demand at 9W vs 1.5W.

Celeron N5095

2021

Why buy it

  • Draws 2W instead of 9W, a 8W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (4,013 vs 4,049).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
  • Older platform position on BGA1338 with DDR4, while Atom x7433RE moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
  • No integrated graphics, while Atom x7433RE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x7433RE better than Celeron N5095?
Yes. Atom x7433RE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Atom x7433RE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x7433RE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Atom x7433RE still makes the most sense overall. Atom x7433RE comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom x7433RE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of BGA1338, 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Atom x7433RE vs Celeron N5095 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Atom x7433RE

The Atom x7433RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 4,049 points. Launch price was $63.

Intel

Celeron N5095

The Celeron N5095 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,013 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Atom x7433RE and Celeron N5095 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7433RE versus 2.9 GHz on the Celeron N5095 — a 15.9% clock advantage for the Atom x7433RE (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Atom x7433RE uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Celeron N5095 uses Jasper Lake (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7433RE scores 4,049 against the Celeron N5095's 4,013 — a 0.9% lead for the Atom x7433RE. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7433RE vs 4 MB on the Celeron N5095.

FeatureAtom x7433RECeleron N5095
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+17%
2.9 GHz
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
2 GHz+33%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)+50%
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)+33%
1.5 MB
Process
10 nm
10 nm
Architecture
Amston Lake (2024−2025)
Jasper Lake (2021)
PassMark
4,049
4,013
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7433RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Celeron N5095 uses BGA1338 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAtom x7433RECeleron N5095
Socket
FCBGA1264
BGA1338
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
9
🔧

Advanced Features

The Atom x7433RE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics (32EU)), while the Celeron N5095 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureAtom x7433RECeleron N5095
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics (32EU)