Atom x7433RE vs Core i3-7130U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7433RE vs Core i3-7130U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7433RE vs Core i3-7130U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7433RE

2024

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 9W instead of 15W, a 6W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1356 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,049 vs 4,055).

Core i3-7130U

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
❌66.7% higher power demand at 15W vs 9W.
❌Older platform position on BGA1356 with DDR4, while Atom x7433RE moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x7433RE better than Core i3-7130U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom x7433RE is ahead with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7130U pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Atom x7433RE also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7130U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x7433RE still makes the most sense overall. Atom x7433RE comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7433RE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2017), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of BGA1356, and 100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Atom x7433RE vs Core i3-7130U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7433RE

The Atom x7433RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 4,049 points. Launch price was $63.

Core i3-7130U

The Core i3-7130U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-U (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,055 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x7433RE packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-7130U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Atom x7433RE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7433RE versus 2.7 GHz on the Core i3-7130U — a 23% clock advantage for the Atom x7433RE (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Atom x7433RE uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i3-7130U uses Kaby Lake-U (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7433RE scores 4,049 against the Core i3-7130U's 4,055 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-7130U. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7433RE vs 3 MB on the Core i3-7130U.

Feature	Atom x7433RE	Core i3-7130U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+26%	2.7 GHz
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	2.7 GHz+80%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+100%	3 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)+300%	512 kB
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Amston Lake (2024−2025)	Kaby Lake-U (2017)
PassMark	4,049	4,055
Geekbench 6 Single	—	900

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7433RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i3-7130U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7433RE versus DDR4-2133 on the Core i3-7130U — the Atom x7433RE supports 125% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-7130U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7433RE) vs 2 (Core i3-7130U). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7433RE) vs 12 (Core i3-7130U) — the Core i3-7130U offers 3 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Atom x7433RE	Core i3-7130U
Socket	FCBGA1264	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+125%	DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	9	12+33%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7433RE) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7130U). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics (32EU) (Atom x7433RE) and HD Graphics 620 (Core i3-7130U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-7130U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-7130U rivals Ryzen 3 3250U.

Feature	Atom x7433RE	Core i3-7130U
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics (32EU)	HD Graphics 620
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	Mainstream Laptop