
Atom x7433RE

FX-8100
Atom x7433RE vs FX-8100 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Atom x7433RE vs FX-8100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Atom x7433RE vs FX-8100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Atom x7433RE
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 9W instead of 95W, a 86W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of AM3+ and older memory support.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (9 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics (32EU), while FX-8100 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8100 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,049 vs 4,095).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
FX-8100
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Atom x7433RE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌955.6% higher power demand at 95W vs 9W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM3+, while Atom x7433RE moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x7433RE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is FX-8100 better than Atom x7433RE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Atom x7433RE vs FX-8100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7433RE
The Atom x7433RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 4,049 points. Launch price was $63.

FX-8100
The FX-8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,095 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Atom x7433RE packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-8100 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8100 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Atom x7433RE versus 3.7 GHz on the FX-8100 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the FX-8100 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Atom x7433RE uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the FX-8100 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7433RE scores 4,049 against the FX-8100's 4,095 — a 1.1% lead for the FX-8100. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7433RE vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-8100.
| Feature | Atom x7433RE | FX-8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.7 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz | 2.8 GHz+87% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 8 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 8 MB+300% |
| Process | 10 nm-69% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Amston Lake (2024−2025) | Zambezi (2011−2012) |
| PassMark | 4,049 | 4,095+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 455 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,621 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom x7433RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the FX-8100 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Atom x7433RE versus DDR3-1866 on the FX-8100 — the Atom x7433RE supports 157.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7433RE) vs 2 (FX-8100). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7433RE) vs 0 (FX-8100) — the Atom x7433RE offers 9 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7433RE) and AMD 990FX,AMD 970 (FX-8100).
| Feature | Atom x7433RE | FX-8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | AM3+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+100% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+157% | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 9 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7433RE) / AMD-V (FX-8100). The Atom x7433RE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics (32EU)), while the FX-8100 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Atom x7433RE | FX-8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics (32EU) | — |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















