
Core i7-2720QM

Ryzen Embedded R2312
Core i7-2720QM vs Ryzen Embedded R2312 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-2720QM vs Ryzen Embedded R2312 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-2720QM vs Ryzen Embedded R2312: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-2720QM
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Ryzen Embedded R2312 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.6 vs 26.3 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.
Ryzen Embedded R2312
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $228 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 148.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.3 vs 10.6 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-2720QM across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,952 vs 4,015).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-2720QM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-2720QM better than Ryzen Embedded R2312?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-2720QM vs Ryzen Embedded R2312 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-2720QM
The Core i7-2720QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,015 points. Launch price was $378.


Ryzen Embedded R2312
The Ryzen Embedded R2312 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 June 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,952 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i7-2720QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R2312 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-2720QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-2720QM versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R2312 — a 5.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded R2312 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i7-2720QM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R2312 uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2720QM scores 4,015 against the Ryzen Embedded R2312's 3,952 — a 1.6% lead for the Core i7-2720QM. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2720QM vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R2312.
| Feature | Core i7-2720QM | Ryzen Embedded R2312 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.5 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.7 GHz+23% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 32 nm | 12 nm-63% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Picasso (2019−2022) |
| PassMark | 4,015+2% | 3,952 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,600 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-2720QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R2312 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-2720QM | Ryzen Embedded R2312 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-2720QM) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded R2312). The Core i7-2720QM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Ryzen Embedded R2312 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2720QM targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-2720QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.
| Feature | Core i7-2720QM | Ryzen Embedded R2312 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Performance Laptop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-2720QM was priced at $378, while the Ryzen Embedded R2312 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($378 vs $150), Ryzen Embedded R2312 was $228 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-2720QM delivers 10.6 pts/$ vs 26.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded R2312 — making the Ryzen Embedded R2312 the 85.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-2720QM | Ryzen Embedded R2312 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $378 | $150-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.6 | 26.3+148% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















