Core i7-2840QM
VS
Core i7-2675QM

Core i7-2840QM vs Core i7-2675QM

Intel

Core i7-2840QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i7-2675QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2840QM is positioned at rank 311 and the Core i7-2675QM is on rank 1070, so the Core i7-2840QM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2840QM

#299
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
458%
#300
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
452%
#301
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
414%
#302
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
413%
#303
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
409%
#305
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
395%
#306
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
379%
#307
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
378%
#308
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
368%
#311
Core i7-2840QM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2675QM

#1058
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2835%
#1059
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2793%
#1060
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2564%
#1061
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2553%
#1062
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2529%
#1064
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2443%
#1065
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2342%
#1066
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2338%
#1067
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2275%
#1070
Core i7-2675QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1071
A9-9410
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
100%
#1073
A8 Pro-7150B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
99%
#1074
A9-9420
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
99%
#1076
Celeron B730
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
99%
#1078
A9-9425
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
98%
#1080
Core i5-4402E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $100
97%
#1082
A6-7000
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
97%
#1083
Core i5-2520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1084
Core i7-2710QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $40
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i7-2675QM delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-2840QM in both compute-intensive tasks (1.8% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-2840QMCore i7-2675QM
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-2840QMCore i7-2675QM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2840QM and Core i7-2675QM

Intel

Core i7-2840QM

The Core i7-2840QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 3,842 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-2675QM

The Core i7-2675QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,913 points. Launch price was $378.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-2840QM and Core i7-2675QM share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core i7-2840QM versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-2675QM — a 25.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-2675QM. Both are built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i7-2840QM scores 3,842 against the Core i7-2675QM's 3,913 — a 1.8% lead for the Core i7-2675QM. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i7-2840QM vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2675QM.

FeatureCore i7-2840QMCore i7-2675QM
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz+29%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB+33%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
3,842
3,913+2%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2840QM uses the G2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-2675QM uses FCBGA1224 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-2840QMCore i7-2675QM
Socket
G2
FCBGA1224
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-2840QM) / VT-x (Core i7-2675QM). The Core i7-2675QM includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Core i7-2840QM requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2675QM targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i7-2840QMCore i7-2675QM
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Mobile