Core i7-2840QM
VS
Athlon 300U

Core i7-2840QM vs Athlon 300U

Intel

Core i7-2840QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2011
VS
AMD

Athlon 300U

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2840QM is positioned at rank 311 and the Athlon 300U is on rank 624, so the Core i7-2840QM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2840QM

#299
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
458%
#300
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
452%
#301
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
414%
#302
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
413%
#303
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
409%
#305
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
395%
#306
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
379%
#307
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
378%
#308
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
368%
#311
Core i7-2840QM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 300U

#612
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
836%
#613
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
824%
#614
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
756%
#615
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
753%
#616
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
746%
#618
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
720%
#619
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
691%
#620
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
689%
#621
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
671%
#624
Athlon 300U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#625
Core 3 N355
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#628
Core i5-1335UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
100%
#638
Celeron Dual-Core T1400
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Athlon 300U (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Dual-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i7-2840QMAthlon 300U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Raven Ridge 2 (2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-2840QM (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i7-2840QMAthlon 300U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2840QM and Athlon 300U

Intel

Core i7-2840QM

The Core i7-2840QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 3,842 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Athlon 300U

The Athlon 300U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Raven Ridge 2 (2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,861 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i7-2840QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Athlon 300U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-2840QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core i7-2840QM versus 3.3 GHz on the Athlon 300U — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Athlon 300U. The Core i7-2840QM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon 300U uses Raven Ridge 2 (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2840QM scores 3,842 against the Athlon 300U's 3,861 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon 300U. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i7-2840QM vs 4 MB (total) on the Athlon 300U.

FeatureCore i7-2840QMAthlon 300U
Cores / Threads
4 / 8+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
3.3 GHz+38%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB+100%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Raven Ridge 2 (2019)
PassMark
3,842
3,861
Geekbench 6 Single
900
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,800
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2840QM uses the G2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 300U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-2840QMAthlon 300U
Socket
G2
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-2840QM) / AMD-V (Athlon 300U). The Athlon 300U includes integrated graphics (Radeon RX Vega 3), while the Core i7-2840QM requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 300U targets Budget Laptop.

FeatureCore i7-2840QMAthlon 300U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon RX Vega 3
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Laptop