Core i7-3517U
VS
Celeron M 900

Core i7-3517U vs Celeron M 900

Intel

Core i7-3517U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Celeron M 900

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3517U is positioned at rank 340 and the Celeron M 900 is on rank 797, so the Core i7-3517U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3517U

#101
Core i5-1350P
MSRP: $320|Avg: $250
97%
#328
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
487%
#329
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
480%
#330
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
441%
#331
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
439%
#332
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
435%
#334
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
420%
#335
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
402%
#336
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
402%
#337
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
391%
#340
Core i7-3517U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 900

#785
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1201%
#786
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1183%
#787
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1086%
#788
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1081%
#789
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1072%
#791
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1035%
#792
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
992%
#793
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
991%
#794
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
964%
#797
Celeron M 900
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
100%
#799
Celeron B815
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#801
Celeron B810
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
100%
#803
Core i7-1365UE
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
99%
#805
3020e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
98%
#809
Athlon II M320
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
98%
#810
Celeron B800
MSRP: $80|Avg: $5
98%
#811
Celeron B710
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i7-3517U delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron M 900 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-3517UCeleron M 900
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-3517UCeleron M 900
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3517U and Celeron M 900

Intel

Core i7-3517U

The Core i7-3517U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,108 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron M 900

The Celeron M 900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,101 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

The Core i7-3517U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron M 900 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core i7-3517U has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i7-3517U versus 2.2 GHz on the Celeron M 900 — a 30.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-3517U. The Core i7-3517U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron M 900 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3517U scores 2,108 against the Celeron M 900's 2,101 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-3517U.

FeatureCore i7-3517UCeleron M 900
Cores / Threads
2 / 4+100%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
3 GHz+36%
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB+300%
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
2,108
2,101
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3517U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron M 900 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-3517UCeleron M 900
Socket
BGA1023
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
1600
Max RAM Capacity
32
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-3517U) / not specified (Celeron M 900). The Core i7-3517U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Celeron M 900 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-3517U rivals AMD A10-4655M.

FeatureCore i7-3517UCeleron M 900
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true