Core i7-3517U vs Xeon X3330

Intel

Core i7-3517U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon X3330

95 WW2008

Core i7-3517U vs Xeon X3330 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-3517U vs Xeon X3330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-3517U vs Xeon X3330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-3517U

2012

Why buy it

  • +0.3% higher PassMark.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while Xeon X3330 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X3330 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
  • 438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.

Xeon X3330

2008

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
  • Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,102 vs 2,108).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-3517U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-3517U better than Xeon X3330?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X3330 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-3517U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3517U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-3517U still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-3517U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-3517U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2008). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-3517U vs Xeon X3330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-3517U

The Core i7-3517U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,108 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Xeon X3330

The Xeon X3330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,102 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i7-3517U is built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-3517U scores 2,108 against the Xeon X3330's 2,102 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-3517U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-3517U vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X3330.

FeatureCore i7-3517UXeon X3330
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3 GHz
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
2.66 GHz+40%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
6 MB L2 Cache+50%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,108
2,102
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3517U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X3330 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-3517UXeon X3330
Socket
BGA1023
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1600
Max RAM Capacity
32
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i7-3517U) / not specified (Xeon X3330). The Core i7-3517U includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Xeon X3330 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-3517U rivals AMD A10-4655M.

FeatureCore i7-3517UXeon X3330
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true