A10-7400P vs Core i7-3517U

A10-7400P vs Core i7-3517U Performance Spectrum

A10-7400P

4 / 4

2,134

+1.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-3517U

2 / 4

2,108

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-7400P vs Core i7-3517U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-7400P vs Core i7-3517U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-7400P

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 512W, a 508W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i7-3517U

2012

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,108 vs 2,134).
❌12700% higher power demand at 512W vs 4W.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-7400P better than Core i7-3517U?

Yes. A10-7400P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-7400P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-7400P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-7400P still makes the most sense overall. A10-7400P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-7400P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-7400P vs Core i7-3517U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-7400P

The A10-7400P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,134 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i7-3517U

The Core i7-3517U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,108 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-7400P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-3517U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-7400P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A10-7400P versus 3 GHz on the Core i7-3517U — a 12.5% clock advantage for the A10-7400P (base: 2.5 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The A10-7400P uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i7-3517U uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7400P scores 2,134 against the Core i7-3517U's 2,108 — a 1.2% lead for the A10-7400P.

Feature	A10-7400P	Core i7-3517U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+13%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+32%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256K (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	2,134+1%	2,108

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7400P uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3517U uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A10-7400P versus 1600 on the Core i7-3517U — the A10-7400P supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-3517U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP3 (A10-7400P) and HM76,UM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i7-3517U).

Feature	A10-7400P	Core i7-3517U
Socket	FP3	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866+17%	1600
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-7400P) vs true (Core i7-3517U). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R6 (A10-7400P) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3517U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7400P targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-7400P rivals Core i5-4200U; Core i7-3517U rivals AMD A10-4655M.