A10-7400P vs Athlon II X4 631

A10-7400P vs Athlon II X4 631 Performance Spectrum

A10-7400P

4 / 4

2,134

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon II X4 631

4 / 4

2,118

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-7400P vs Athlon II X4 631 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-7400P vs Athlon II X4 631: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-7400P

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 100W, a 96W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R6, while Athlon II X4 631 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Athlon II X4 631

2011

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,118 vs 2,134).
❌Launch MSRP is still $80 MSRP, while A10-7400P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2400% higher power demand at 100W vs 4W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-7400P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-7400P better than Athlon II X4 631?

Yes. A10-7400P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-7400P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-7400P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-7400P is still the much better call for a fresh build. A10-7400P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $80 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon II X4 631 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (26.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on FM1.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-7400P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-7400P vs Athlon II X4 631 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-7400P

The A10-7400P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,134 points. Launch price was $130.

Athlon II X4 631

The Athlon II X4 631 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,118 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A10-7400P and Athlon II X4 631 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A10-7400P versus 2.6 GHz on the Athlon II X4 631 — a 26.7% clock advantage for the A10-7400P (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The A10-7400P uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon II X4 631 uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7400P scores 2,134 against the Athlon II X4 631's 2,118 — a 0.8% lead for the A10-7400P.

Feature	A10-7400P	Athlon II X4 631
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+31%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	2.6 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	4096 kB+300%	1 MB (per core)
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark	2,134	2,118

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7400P uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X4 631 uses FM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1866 memory speed. The Athlon II X4 631 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP3 (A10-7400P) and AMD FM1 (Athlon II X4 631).

Feature	A10-7400P	Athlon II X4 631
Socket	FP3	FM1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	64 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-7400P) / not specified (Athlon II X4 631). The A10-7400P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Athlon II X4 631 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7400P targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-7400P rivals Core i5-4200U.