A10-7400P vs Core 2 Duo T5900

A10-7400P vs Core 2 Duo T5900 Performance Spectrum

A10-7400P

4 / 4

2,134

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Duo T5900

2 / 2

2,123

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-7400P vs Core 2 Duo T5900 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-7400P vs Core 2 Duo T5900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-7400P

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R6, while Core 2 Duo T5900 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌100% higher power demand at 4W vs 2W.

Core 2 Duo T5900

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 4W, a 2W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,123 vs 2,134).
❌No integrated graphics, while A10-7400P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-7400P better than Core 2 Duo T5900?

Yes. A10-7400P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-7400P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-7400P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-7400P still makes the most sense overall. A10-7400P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-7400P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-7400P vs Core 2 Duo T5900 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-7400P

The A10-7400P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,134 points. Launch price was $130.

Core 2 Duo T5900

The Core 2 Duo T5900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 2,123 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-7400P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T5900 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-7400P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A10-7400P versus 2.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5900 — a 42.9% clock advantage for the A10-7400P. The A10-7400P uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5900 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7400P scores 2,134 against the Core 2 Duo T5900's 2,123 — a 0.5% lead for the A10-7400P.

Feature	A10-7400P	Core 2 Duo T5900
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+55%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	—
L2 Cache	4096 kB+100%	2 MB
Process	28 nm-57%	65 nm
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark	2,134	2,123

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7400P uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo T5900 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-7400P	Core 2 Duo T5900
Socket	FP3	P
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-7400P) / not specified (Core 2 Duo T5900). The A10-7400P includes integrated graphics (Radeon R6), while the Core 2 Duo T5900 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7400P targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-7400P rivals Core i5-4200U.