A10-7400P vs Core i3-5010U

A10-7400P vs Core i3-5010U Performance Spectrum

A10-7400P

4 / 4

2,134

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-5010U

2 / 4

2,157

+1.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-7400P vs Core i3-5010U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-7400P vs Core i3-5010U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-7400P

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 512W, a 508W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,134 vs 2,157).

Core i3-5010U

2015

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌12700% higher power demand at 512W vs 4W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-5010U better than A10-7400P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10-7400P is ahead with a 0.9% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-5010U pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-5010U is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-5010U still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-5010U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-5010U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-7400P vs Core i3-5010U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-7400P

The A10-7400P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,134 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i3-5010U

The Core i3-5010U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,157 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-7400P packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-5010U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-7400P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A10-7400P versus 2.1 GHz on the Core i3-5010U — a 47.3% clock advantage for the A10-7400P (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The A10-7400P uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-5010U uses Broadwell-U (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7400P scores 2,134 against the Core i3-5010U's 2,157 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i3-5010U.

Feature	A10-7400P	Core i3-5010U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+62%	2.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+19%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256K (per core)
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Broadwell-U (2015)
PassMark	2,134	2,157+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	737

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7400P uses the FP3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-5010U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A10-7400P versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i3-5010U — the A10-7400P supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-7400P) vs 12 (Core i3-5010U) — the A10-7400P offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A10-7400P	Core i3-5010U
Socket	FP3	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866+17%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-7400P) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-5010U). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R6 (A10-7400P) and HD Graphics 5500 (Core i3-5010U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7400P targets Laptop, Core i3-5010U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-7400P rivals Core i5-4200U; Core i3-5010U rivals A10-8700P.