Core i7-3610QE vs Core i5-4670R
Core i7-3610QE
Core i5-4670R
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3610QE is positioned at rank 945 and the Core i5-4670R is on rank 719, so the Core i5-4670R offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3610QE
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4670R
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-3610QE | Core i5-4670R |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($105) | ✅ More affordable ($29) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-3610QE | Core i5-4670R |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+262%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($105) | ✅ More affordable ($29) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3610QE and Core i5-4670R
Core i7-3610QE
The Core i7-3610QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,234 points. Launch price was $149.
Core i5-4670R
The Core i5-4670R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,233 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-3610QE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i5-4670R's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3610QE versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-4670R — a 11.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-4670R (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-3610QE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-4670R uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3610QE scores 5,234 against the Core i5-4670R's 5,233 — a 0% lead for the Core i7-3610QE. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i7-3610QE vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-4670R.
| Feature | Core i7-3610QE | Core i5-4670R |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.7 GHz+12% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3 GHz+30% |
| L3 Cache | 6144 kB (total)+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 5,234 | 5,233 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-3610QE uses the G2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4670R uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-3610QE | Core i5-4670R |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | G2 | BGA1364 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3610QE) / not specified (Core i5-4670R). The Core i7-3610QE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4000), while the Core i5-4670R requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3610QE targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core i7-3610QE | Core i5-4670R |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4000 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-3610QE launched at $315 MSRP, while the Core i5-4670R debuted at $224. At current prices ($105 vs $29), the Core i5-4670R is $76 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-3610QE delivers 49.8 pts/$ vs 180.4 pts/$ for the Core i5-4670R — making the Core i5-4670R the 113.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-3610QE | Core i5-4670R |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $315 | $224-29% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $105 | $29-72% |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.8 | 180.4+262% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-3610QE and Core i5-4670R
