Core i7-3610QE
VS
Core i5-4670S

Core i7-3610QE vs Core i5-4670S

Intel

Core i7-3610QE

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i5-4670S

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3610QE is positioned at rank 945 and the Core i5-4670S is on rank 693, so the Core i5-4670S offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3610QE

#933
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1765%
#934
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1739%
#935
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1597%
#936
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1590%
#937
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1575%
#939
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1521%
#940
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1458%
#941
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1456%
#942
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1417%
#945
Core i7-3610QE
MSRP: $315|Avg: $105
100%
#948
A8-8600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
99%
#950
FX-9800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
99%
#951
Celeron 1020E
MSRP: $86|Avg: $20
98%
#954
Core i7-5850EQ
MSRP: $435|Avg: $370
97%
#956
Core i7-4810MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
97%
#959
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
96%
#960
Celeron 4305UE
MSRP: $107|Avg: $107
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4670S

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12641%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11944%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8672%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2613%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2069%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1810%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1037%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1023%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
932%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
932%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
921%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
896%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
884%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
880%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
872%
#693
Core i5-4670S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $30
100%
#694
Core i5-3550
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
100%
#695
Core i3-7300
MSRP: $184|Avg: $46
100%
#696
FX-4300
MSRP: $122|Avg: $25
100%
#697
Core i5-3450
MSRP: $184|Avg: $95
100%
#698
Celeron G550
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
99%
#700
Core i3-4370T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
99%
#701
FX-6200
MSRP: $169|Avg: $25
99%
#702
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
98%
#703
Core i5-2450P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $30
98%
#704
Core i5-4690T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $98
98%
#705
Core i5-4430S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $90
97%
#706
Core i5-4440S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i5-4670S delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-3610QE in both compute-intensive tasks (0.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-3610QECore i5-4670S
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($105)
More affordable ($30)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i5-4670S stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 71% cheaper ($30 vs $105) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i7-3610QECore i5-4670S
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+251%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($105)
More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3610QE and Core i5-4670S

Intel

Core i7-3610QE

The Core i7-3610QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 5,234 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i5-4670S

The Core i5-4670S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,252 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i7-3610QE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i5-4670S's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-3610QE versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-4670S — a 14.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-4670S (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i7-3610QE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-4670S uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3610QE scores 5,234 against the Core i5-4670S's 5,252 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-4670S. Both processors carry 6144 kB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i7-3610QECore i5-4670S
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
3.8 GHz+15%
Base Clock
2.3 GHz
3.1 GHz+35%
L3 Cache
6144 kB (total)
6144 kB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
5,234
5,252
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3610QE uses the G2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4670S uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore i7-3610QECore i5-4670S
Socket
G2
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3610QE) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i5-4670S) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3610QE targets Mobile, Core i5-4670S targets Desktop Low Power.

FeatureCore i7-3610QECore i5-4670S
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4000
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Mobile
Desktop Low Power
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-3610QE launched at $315 MSRP, while the Core i5-4670S debuted at $213. At current prices ($105 vs $30), the Core i5-4670S is $75 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-3610QE delivers 49.8 pts/$ vs 175.1 pts/$ for the Core i5-4670S — making the Core i5-4670S the 111.3% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-3610QECore i5-4670S
MSRP
$315
$213-32%
Avg Price (30d)
$105
$30-71%
Performance per Dollar
49.8
175.1+252%
Release Date
2012
2013