Core i7-3612QE
VS
Xeon E5645

Core i7-3612QE vs Xeon E5645

Intel

Core i7-3612QE

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Xeon E5645

6 Cores12 Thrd80 WWMax: 2.67 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3612QE is positioned at rank 1042 and the Xeon E5645 is on rank 669, so the Xeon E5645 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3612QE

#1029
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2536%
#1030
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2499%
#1031
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2294%
#1032
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2283%
#1033
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2263%
#1035
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2185%
#1036
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2095%
#1037
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2092%
#1038
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2035%
#1041
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
100%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
100%
#1043
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
99%
#1044
A6 Micro-6500T
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
99%
#1045
Pentium N3520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
99%
#1046
E2-3800
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
98%
#1047
Athlon X2 QL-66
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
98%
#1048
Athlon II Neo K145
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
#1049
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
97%
#1050
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
#1051
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
96%
#1052
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
96%
#1053
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
95%
#1055
Athlon X2 QL-65
MSRP: $150|Avg: $22
94%
#1056
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5645

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
12363%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2334%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2074%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1602%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $1000
100%
#396
Xeon Platinum 8461V
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
99%
#397
Xeon W-3235
MSRP: $1538|Avg: $1538
99%
#398
Xeon w9-3595X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6000
99%
#399
Xeon W-3365
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499
97%
#669
Xeon E5645
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
100%
#670
Xeon X5672
MSRP: $300|Avg: $44
100%
#671
Xeon E5-4603
MSRP: $202|Avg: $80
100%
#674
Xeon E3-1265L v4
MSRP: $417|Avg: $80
99%
#677
Xeon E5-1607 v2
MSRP: $250|Avg: $68
99%
#678
Xeon W5590
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
98%
#683
Xeon E5-1603 v3
MSRP: $273|Avg: $40
97%
#684
Xeon E3-1270
MSRP: $330|Avg: $178
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($294) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5645 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i7-3612QEXeon E5645
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($50)
⚠️ Higher cost ($294)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-3612QE ($50), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($244 less, 83% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i7-3612QEXeon E5645
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+486%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️ Higher cost ($294)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3612QE and Xeon E5645

Intel

Core i7-3612QE

The Core i7-3612QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,929 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Xeon E5645

The Xeon E5645 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,942 points. Launch price was $294.

Processing Power

The Core i7-3612QE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5645 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5645 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-3612QE versus 2.67 GHz on the Xeon E5645 — a 14.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-3612QE (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-3612QE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5645 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3612QE scores 4,929 against the Xeon E5645's 4,942 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5645. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i7-3612QE vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E5645.

FeatureCore i7-3612QEXeon E5645
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz+16%
2.67 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.4 GHz+14%
L3 Cache
6144 kB (total)
12 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark
4,929
4,942
Geekbench 6 Single
640
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,200
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3612QE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5645 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Xeon E5645 supports up to 288 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 178.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-3612QE) vs 3 (Xeon E5645). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-3612QE) vs 0 (Xeon E5645) — the Core i7-3612QE offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i7-3612QEXeon E5645
Socket
BGA1023
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
288 GB+1700%
RAM Channels
2
3+50%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3612QE) vs VT-x (Xeon E5645). The Core i7-3612QE includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Xeon E5645 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3612QE targets Industrial/Embedded, Xeon E5645 targets Server.

FeatureCore i7-3612QEXeon E5645
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x
Target Use
Industrial/Embedded
Server
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-3612QE launched at $426 MSRP, while the Xeon E5645 debuted at $294.

FeatureCore i7-3612QEXeon E5645
MSRP
$426
$294-31%
Avg Price (30d)
$50
Release Date
2012
2010