Core i7-3612QM
VS
Core i7-2960XM

Core i7-3612QM vs Core i7-2960XM

Intel

Core i7-3612QM

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i7-2960XM

4 Cores8 Thrd55 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3612QM is positioned at rank 1030 and the Core i7-2960XM is on rank 60, so the Core i7-2960XM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3612QM

#1018
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2380%
#1019
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2345%
#1020
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2152%
#1021
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2143%
#1022
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2123%
#1024
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2050%
#1025
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1966%
#1026
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1963%
#1027
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1910%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
99%
#1033
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
99%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
97%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
96%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
#1039
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
95%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
94%
#1043
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
94%
#1044
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
93%
#1045
A6 Micro-6500T
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2960XM

#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
99%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
93%
#48
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
218%
#49
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
215%
#50
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
197%
#51
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
196%
#52
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
195%
#54
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
188%
#55
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
180%
#56
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
180%
#57
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
175%
#60
Core i7-2960XM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#65
Core i5-3320M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#66
Core i7-4510U
MSRP: $393|Avg: N/A
98%
#69
Core 2 Quad Q9100
MSRP: $14|Avg: $14
96%
#75
Core i3-4030U
MSRP: $281|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i7-2960XM delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-3612QM in both compute-intensive tasks (1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-3612QMCore i7-2960XM
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-3612QMCore i7-2960XM
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3612QM and Core i7-2960XM

Intel

Core i7-3612QM

The Core i7-3612QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,661 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i7-2960XM

The Core i7-2960XM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,709 points. Launch price was $1,096.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-3612QM and Core i7-2960XM share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-3612QM versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-2960XM — a 17.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-2960XM (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i7-3612QM uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-2960XM uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3612QM scores 4,661 against the Core i7-2960XM's 4,709 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-2960XM. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-3612QM vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-2960XM.

FeatureCore i7-3612QMCore i7-2960XM
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
3.7 GHz+19%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
2.7 GHz+29%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
8 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
4,661
4,709+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
600
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,600
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3612QM uses the FCBGA1224 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-2960XM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i7-3612QM versus 1600 on the Core i7-2960XM — the Core i7-2960XM supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM75,HM76,HM77,QM77 (Core i7-3612QM) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i7-2960XM).

FeatureCore i7-3612QMCore i7-2960XM
Socket
FCBGA1224
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
1600+53233%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+104857500%
32
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-2960XM has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-3612QM) vs true (Core i7-2960XM). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3612QM) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2960XM) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3612QM targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3612QM rivals AMD A10-5750M; Core i7-2960XM rivals Core i7-2820QM.

FeatureCore i7-3612QMCore i7-2960XM
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
true
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop